SKZ vs YZK Fund Comparison
Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of SKZ (Neo Portföy Sekizinci Serbest Fon) and YZK (Yapı Kredi Portföy Kalamış Serbest Fon) side by side.
If You Had Invested TRY 10,000
Metric Comparison
| Metric | SKZ | YZK | Category median |
|---|---|---|---|
| Daily | −0.36% | 0.23% | 0.01% |
| 1 week | −1.08% | 0.40% | 0.30% |
| 1 month | −1.42% | 1.21% | 0.00% |
| 3 months | 2.18% | 4.04% | 3.96% |
| 6 months | 12.36% | 8.75% | 8.18% |
| YTD | 41.84% | 13.71% | 15.73% |
| 1 year | — | 20.66% | 20.69% |
| 3 years | — | 124.76% | 105.65% |
Popular Comparisons
Popular Fund Comparisons
Related Pages
About the SKZ vs YZK Comparison
The price, returns, size and risk of SKZ (Neo Portföy Sekizinci Serbest Fon) and YZK (Yapı Kredi Portföy Kalamış Serbest Fon) are compared side by side as of October 23, 2026. Of the 9 metrics compared, SKZ leads in 3 and YZK leads in 6. SKZ is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Neo Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; YZK is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Yapı Kredi Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..
Highlights: Daily: YZK leads (0.23% vs −0.36%). 1 week: YZK leads (0.40% vs −1.08%). 1 month: YZK leads (1.21% vs −1.42%). 3 months: YZK leads (4.04% vs 2.18%). 6 months: SKZ leads (12.36% vs 8.75%). YTD: SKZ leads (41.84% vs 13.71%). Size (TRY): YZK leads (196.6M vs 188.6M). Investors: SKZ leads (411 vs 171). Risk: YZK leads (5 vs 7).
Frequently Asked Questions
Which earned more, SKZ or YZK?
Year to date SKZ returned 41.84% and YZK returned 13.71%; over the last year SKZ returned — and YZK returned 20.66%. Over the last month SKZ returned −1.42% and YZK returned 1.21%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.
Which is larger and which has more investors, SKZ or YZK?
As of October 23, 2026, SKZ has a size of TRY 188.6M with 411 investors, while YZK has a size of TRY 196.6M with 171 investors. YZK leads in size and SKZ leads in investor count.
What do the risk scores of SKZ and YZK mean?
The CMB risk score of SKZ is 7 out of 7 and that of YZK is 5. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.