Yatırımcı.AI

EDP vs SKZ Fund Comparison

Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of EDP (Neo Portföy Koruncuk Eğitime Destek Para Piyasası Serbest Fon) and SKZ (Neo Portföy Sekizinci Serbest Fon) side by side.

EDPSKZ
StockFund

If You Had Invested TRY 10,000

Metric Comparison

EDP vs SKZ Fund Comparison
MetricEDPSKZCategory median
Daily0.09%−0.44%0.05%
1 week0.64%−0.55%0.44%
1 month2.80%−1.02%0.38%
3 months9.96%2.67%3.95%
6 months21.57%12.76%8.45%
YTD24.10%42.35%16.06%
Returns are based on prices as of October 22, 2026; the fund with the higher return or the lower risk score counts as the leader.

Popular Comparisons

Popular Fund Comparisons

Related Pages

About the EDP vs SKZ Comparison

The price, returns, size and risk of EDP (Neo Portföy Koruncuk Eğitime Destek Para Piyasası Serbest Fon) and SKZ (Neo Portföy Sekizinci Serbest Fon) are compared side by side as of October 22, 2026. Of the 9 metrics compared, EDP leads in 6 and SKZ leads in 3. EDP is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Neo Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; SKZ is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Neo Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..

Highlights: Daily: EDP leads (0.09% vs −0.44%). 1 week: EDP leads (0.64% vs −0.55%). 1 month: EDP leads (2.80% vs −1.02%). 3 months: EDP leads (9.96% vs 2.67%). 6 months: EDP leads (21.57% vs 12.76%). YTD: SKZ leads (42.35% vs 24.10%). Size (TRY): SKZ leads (189.3M vs 187.6M). Investors: SKZ leads (417 vs 63). Risk: EDP leads (2 vs 7).

Frequently Asked Questions

Year to date EDP returned 24.10% and SKZ returned 42.35%; over the last year EDP returned — and SKZ returned —. Over the last month EDP returned 2.80% and SKZ returned −1.02%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.

As of October 22, 2026, EDP has a size of TRY 187.6M with 63 investors, while SKZ has a size of TRY 189.3M with 417 investors. SKZ leads in size and SKZ leads in investor count.

The CMB risk score of EDP is 2 out of 7 and that of SKZ is 7. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.