RTG vs SVB Fund Comparison
Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of RTG (Ata Portföy Robotik Teknolojileri Değişken Fon) and SVB (Strateji Portföy Agresif Değişken Fon) side by side.
If You Had Invested TRY 10,000
Metric Comparison
| Metric | RTG | SVB | Category median |
|---|---|---|---|
| Today (est.) | — | −1.29% | −0.24% |
| Daily | 2.66% | 1.21% | 1.07% |
| 1 week | −3.12% | 8.10% | 2.38% |
| 1 month | −16.36% | −1.63% | −0.76% |
| 3 months | −11.95% | −6.84% | 0.00% |
| 6 months | −8.04% | −9.80% | 0.00% |
| YTD | 22.23% | 7.09% | 22.39% |
| 1 year | 26.86% | 8.21% | 28.39% |
| 3 years | 167.96% | 137.69% | 154.30% |
Popular Comparisons
Popular Fund Comparisons
Related Pages
About the RTG vs SVB Comparison
The price, returns, size and risk of RTG (Ata Portföy Robotik Teknolojileri Değişken Fon) and SVB (Strateji Portföy Agresif Değişken Fon) are compared side by side as of November 10, 2026. Of the 11 metrics compared, RTG leads in 7 and SVB leads in 4. RTG is a Variable Fund fund managed by Ata Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; SVB is a Variable Fund fund managed by Strateji Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..
Highlights: Daily: RTG leads (2.66% vs 1.21%). 1 week: SVB leads (8.10% vs −3.12%). 1 month: SVB leads (−1.63% vs −16.36%). 3 months: SVB leads (−6.84% vs −11.95%). 6 months: RTG leads (−8.04% vs −9.80%). YTD: RTG leads (22.23% vs 7.09%). 1 year: RTG leads (26.86% vs 8.21%). 3 years: RTG leads (167.96% vs 137.69%). Size (TRY): RTG leads (174.1M vs 168.9M). Investors: RTG leads (3,763 vs 1,043). Risk: SVB leads (5 vs 6).
Frequently Asked Questions
Which earned more, RTG or SVB?
Year to date RTG returned 22.23% and SVB returned 7.09%; over the last year RTG returned 26.86% and SVB returned 8.21%. Over the last month RTG returned −16.36% and SVB returned −1.63%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.
Which is larger and which has more investors, RTG or SVB?
As of November 10, 2026, RTG has a size of TRY 174.1M with 3,763 investors, while SVB has a size of TRY 168.9M with 1,043 investors. RTG leads in size and RTG leads in investor count.
What do the risk scores of RTG and SVB mean?
The CMB risk score of RTG is 6 out of 7 and that of SVB is 5. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.