SVB vs TSZ Fund Comparison
Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of SVB (Strateji Portföy Agresif Değişken Fon) and TSZ (Agesa Hayat ve Emeklilik A.Ş. Taşınmaz ve İnşaat Sektörü Değişken Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) side by side.
If You Had Invested TRY 10,000
Metric Comparison
| Metric | SVB | TSZ | Category median |
|---|---|---|---|
| Today (est.) | −2.69% | — | −1.59% |
| Daily | 0.31% | 0.18% | 0.32% |
| 1 week | −0.81% | −0.74% | 0.42% |
| 1 month | −7.12% | −10.14% | −1.48% |
| 3 months | −6.07% | −8.52% | 4.48% |
| 6 months | 0.87% | 0.85% | 14.82% |
| YTD | 9.65% | 8.49% | 25.33% |
| 1 year | 16.82% | 10.79% | 35.72% |
| 3 years | 136.91% | — | 161.05% |
Popular Comparisons
Related Pages
About the SVB vs TSZ Comparison
The price, returns, size and risk of SVB (Strateji Portföy Agresif Değişken Fon) and TSZ (Agesa Hayat ve Emeklilik A.Ş. Taşınmaz ve İnşaat Sektörü Değişken Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) are compared side by side as of September 28, 2026. Of the 9 metrics compared, SVB leads in 6 and TSZ leads in 3. SVB is a Variable Fund fund managed by Strateji Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; TSZ is a Variable Fund fund managed by Agesa Hayat ve Emeklilik A.Ş..
Highlights: Daily: SVB leads (0.31% vs 0.18%). 1 week: TSZ leads (−0.74% vs −0.81%). 1 month: SVB leads (−7.12% vs −10.14%). 3 months: SVB leads (−6.07% vs −8.52%). 6 months: SVB leads (0.87% vs 0.85%). YTD: SVB leads (9.65% vs 8.49%). 1 year: SVB leads (16.82% vs 10.79%). Size (TRY): TSZ leads (194M vs 188.2M). Investors: TSZ leads (6,238 vs 1,110).
Frequently Asked Questions
Which earned more, SVB or TSZ?
Year to date SVB returned 9.65% and TSZ returned 8.49%; over the last year SVB returned 16.82% and TSZ returned 10.79%. Over the last month SVB returned −7.12% and TSZ returned −10.14%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.
Which is larger and which has more investors, SVB or TSZ?
As of September 28, 2026, SVB has a size of TRY 188.2M with 1,110 investors, while TSZ has a size of TRY 194M with 6,238 investors. TSZ leads in size and TSZ leads in investor count.
What do the risk scores of SVB and TSZ mean?
The CMB risk score of SVB is 5 out of 7 and that of TSZ is 5. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.