Yatırımcı.AI

AFJ vs RTG Fund Comparison

Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of AFJ (Allianz Yaşam ve Emeklilik A.Ş. OKS Temkinli Değişken Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) and RTG (Ata Portföy Robotik Teknolojileri Değişken Fon) side by side.

AFJRTG
StockFund

If You Had Invested TRY 10,000

Metric Comparison

AFJ vs RTG Fund Comparison
MetricAFJRTGCategory median
Daily−0.06%−3.04%−1.41%
1 week0.35%−0.28%−0.69%
1 month1.41%−11.36%−3.96%
3 months7.28%−3.15%−1.43%
6 months15.15%5.87%1.85%
YTD31.17%27.66%17.97%
1 year39.94%26.95%23.69%
3 years230.48%198.58%149.99%
Returns are based on prices as of November 2, 2026; the fund with the higher return or the lower risk score counts as the leader.

Popular Comparisons

Popular Fund Comparisons

Related Pages

About the AFJ vs RTG Comparison

The price, returns, size and risk of AFJ (Allianz Yaşam ve Emeklilik A.Ş. OKS Temkinli Değişken Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) and RTG (Ata Portföy Robotik Teknolojileri Değişken Fon) are compared side by side as of November 2, 2026. Of the 11 metrics compared, AFJ leads in 9 and RTG leads in 2. AFJ is a Variable Fund fund managed by Allianz Yaşam ve Emeklilik A.Ş.; RTG is a Variable Fund fund managed by Ata Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..

Highlights: Daily: AFJ leads (−0.06% vs −3.04%). 1 week: AFJ leads (0.35% vs −0.28%). 1 month: AFJ leads (1.41% vs −11.36%). 3 months: AFJ leads (7.28% vs −3.15%). 6 months: AFJ leads (15.15% vs 5.87%). YTD: AFJ leads (31.17% vs 27.66%). 1 year: AFJ leads (39.94% vs 26.95%). 3 years: AFJ leads (230.48% vs 198.58%). Size (TRY): RTG leads (183M vs 179.7M). Investors: RTG leads (3,833 vs 2,997). Risk: AFJ leads (2 vs 6).

Frequently Asked Questions

Year to date AFJ returned 31.17% and RTG returned 27.66%; over the last year AFJ returned 39.94% and RTG returned 26.95%. Over the last month AFJ returned 1.41% and RTG returned −11.36%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.

As of November 2, 2026, AFJ has a size of TRY 179.7M with 2,997 investors, while RTG has a size of TRY 183M with 3,833 investors. RTG leads in size and RTG leads in investor count.

The CMB risk score of AFJ is 2 out of 7 and that of RTG is 6. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.