Yatırımcı.AI

RBA vs TLK Fund Comparison

Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of RBA (Albaraka Portföy Bereket Vakfı Na Destek Altın Katılım Fonu) and TLK (Aktif Portföy Para Piyasası Katılım (TL) Fonu) side by side.

RBATLK
StockFund

If You Had Invested TRY 10,000

Metric Comparison

RBA vs TLK Fund Comparison
MetricRBATLKCategory median
Daily−0.82%0.10%−0.60%
1 week−1.09%0.66%−0.86%
1 month−3.38%2.94%−0.33%
3 months3.93%9.69%4.42%
6 months−7.02%20.77%12.01%
YTD3.39%34.85%28.30%
1 year6.32%44.72%34.68%
3 years239.39%—158.22%
Returns are based on prices as of October 23, 2026; the fund with the higher return or the lower risk score counts as the leader.

Popular Comparisons

Popular Fund Comparisons

Related Pages

About the RBA vs TLK Comparison

The price, returns, size and risk of RBA (Albaraka Portföy Bereket Vakfı Na Destek Altın Katılım Fonu) and TLK (Aktif Portföy Para Piyasası Katılım (TL) Fonu) are compared side by side as of October 23, 2026. Of the 10 metrics compared, RBA leads in 2 and TLK leads in 8. RBA is a Shariah-compliant Fund fund managed by Albaraka Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; TLK is a Shariah-compliant Fund fund managed by Aktif Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..

Highlights: Daily: TLK leads (0.10% vs −0.82%). 1 week: TLK leads (0.66% vs −1.09%). 1 month: TLK leads (2.94% vs −3.38%). 3 months: TLK leads (9.69% vs 3.93%). 6 months: TLK leads (20.77% vs −7.02%). YTD: TLK leads (34.85% vs 3.39%). 1 year: TLK leads (44.72% vs 6.32%). Size (TRY): RBA leads (1.3B vs 1.1B). Investors: RBA leads (4,835 vs 1,011). Risk: TLK leads (1 vs 6).

Frequently Asked Questions

Year to date RBA returned 3.39% and TLK returned 34.85%; over the last year RBA returned 6.32% and TLK returned 44.72%. Over the last month RBA returned −3.38% and TLK returned 2.94%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.

As of October 23, 2026, RBA has a size of TRY 1.3B with 4,835 investors, while TLK has a size of TRY 1.1B with 1,011 investors. RBA leads in size and RBA leads in investor count.

The CMB risk score of RBA is 6 out of 7 and that of TLK is 1. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.