Yatırımcı.AI

CPU vs TLK Fund Comparison

Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of CPU (Aktif Portföy Teknoloji Katılım Fonu) and TLK (Aktif Portföy Para Piyasası Katılım (TL) Fonu) side by side.

CPUTLK
StockFund

If You Had Invested TRY 10,000

Metric Comparison

CPU vs TLK Fund Comparison
MetricCPUTLKCategory median
Daily0.40%0.07%0.03%
1 week−2.87%0.66%0.06%
1 month−1.34%2.94%0.00%
3 months3.32%9.70%6.19%
6 months25.78%20.65%12.49%
YTD56.15%34.72%28.76%
1 year69.41%44.73%36.24%
3 years56.53%—159.62%
Returns are based on prices as of October 22, 2026; the fund with the higher return or the lower risk score counts as the leader.

Popular Comparisons

Popular Fund Comparisons

Related Pages

About the CPU vs TLK Comparison

The price, returns, size and risk of CPU (Aktif Portföy Teknoloji Katılım Fonu) and TLK (Aktif Portföy Para Piyasası Katılım (TL) Fonu) are compared side by side as of October 22, 2026. Of the 10 metrics compared, CPU leads in 5 and TLK leads in 5. CPU is a Shariah-compliant Fund fund managed by Aktif Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; TLK is a Shariah-compliant Fund fund managed by Aktif Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..

Highlights: Daily: CPU leads (0.40% vs 0.07%). 1 week: TLK leads (0.66% vs −2.87%). 1 month: TLK leads (2.94% vs −1.34%). 3 months: TLK leads (9.70% vs 3.32%). 6 months: CPU leads (25.78% vs 20.65%). YTD: CPU leads (56.15% vs 34.72%). 1 year: CPU leads (69.41% vs 44.73%). Size (TRY): TLK leads (977.9M vs 897.6M). Investors: CPU leads (14,992 vs 1,018). Risk: TLK leads (1 vs 5).

Frequently Asked Questions

Year to date CPU returned 56.15% and TLK returned 34.72%; over the last year CPU returned 69.41% and TLK returned 44.73%. Over the last month CPU returned −1.34% and TLK returned 2.94%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.

As of October 22, 2026, CPU has a size of TRY 897.6M with 14,992 investors, while TLK has a size of TRY 977.9M with 1,018 investors. TLK leads in size and CPU leads in investor count.

The CMB risk score of CPU is 5 out of 7 and that of TLK is 1. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.