Yatırımcı.AI

PRU vs RPN Fund Comparison

Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of PRU (Allbatross Portföy Kısa Vadeli Serbest (TL) Fon) and RPN (Rota Portföy Nev Serbest Fon) side by side.

PRURPN
StockFund

If You Had Invested TRY 10,000

Metric Comparison

PRU vs RPN Fund Comparison
MetricPRURPNCategory median
Daily0.34%−1.94%0.16%
1 week0.80%−4.29%0.46%
1 month3.67%−10.23%1.10%
3 months11.45%−19.22%3.53%
6 months25.80%−14.43%8.53%
YTD46.32%−3.91%16.18%
1 year58.41%0.13%19.94%
3 years281.32%24.31%103.56%
Returns are based on prices as of November 2, 2026; the fund with the higher return or the lower risk score counts as the leader.

Popular Comparisons

Popular Fund Comparisons

Related Pages

About the PRU vs RPN Comparison

The price, returns, size and risk of PRU (Allbatross Portföy Kısa Vadeli Serbest (TL) Fon) and RPN (Rota Portföy Nev Serbest Fon) are compared side by side as of November 2, 2026. Of the 11 metrics compared, PRU leads in 11 and RPN leads in 0. PRU is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Allbatross Portföy Yönetimi Anonim Şirketi; RPN is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Rota Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..

Highlights: Daily: PRU leads (0.34% vs −1.94%). 1 week: PRU leads (0.80% vs −4.29%). 1 month: PRU leads (3.67% vs −10.23%). 3 months: PRU leads (11.45% vs −19.22%). 6 months: PRU leads (25.80% vs −14.43%). YTD: PRU leads (46.32% vs −3.91%). 1 year: PRU leads (58.41% vs 0.13%). 3 years: PRU leads (281.32% vs 24.31%). Size (TRY): PRU leads (689.3M vs 676.5M). Investors: PRU leads (915 vs 22). Risk: PRU leads (2 vs 7).

Frequently Asked Questions

Year to date PRU returned 46.32% and RPN returned −3.91%; over the last year PRU returned 58.41% and RPN returned 0.13%. Over the last month PRU returned 3.67% and RPN returned −10.23%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.

As of November 2, 2026, PRU has a size of TRY 689.3M with 915 investors, while RPN has a size of TRY 676.5M with 22 investors. PRU leads in size and PRU leads in investor count.

The CMB risk score of PRU is 2 out of 7 and that of RPN is 7. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.