Yatırımcı.AI

PPV vs ROF Fund Comparison

Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of PPV (Aktif Portföy Para Piyasası Serbest (TL) Fon) and ROF (Rota Portföy Onuncu Hisse Senedi Serbest Fon (Hisse Senedi Yoğun Fon)) side by side.

PPVROF
StockFund

If You Had Invested TRY 10,000

Metric Comparison

PPV vs ROF Fund Comparison
MetricPPVROFCategory median
Daily0.10%2.93%0.20%
1 week0.68%−1.21%0.47%
1 month3.13%−7.25%1.35%
3 months9.71%−6.65%3.70%
6 months21.14%−9.66%8.84%
YTD23.76%6.37%16.33%
1 year—28.85%20.23%
3 years—193.00%103.91%
Returns are based on prices as of November 3, 2026; the fund with the higher return or the lower risk score counts as the leader.

Popular Comparisons

Popular Fund Comparisons

Related Pages

About the PPV vs ROF Comparison

The price, returns, size and risk of PPV (Aktif Portföy Para Piyasası Serbest (TL) Fon) and ROF (Rota Portföy Onuncu Hisse Senedi Serbest Fon (Hisse Senedi Yoğun Fon)) are compared side by side as of November 3, 2026. Of the 9 metrics compared, PPV leads in 7 and ROF leads in 2. PPV is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Aktif Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; ROF is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Rota Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..

Highlights: Daily: ROF leads (2.93% vs 0.10%). 1 week: PPV leads (0.68% vs −1.21%). 1 month: PPV leads (3.13% vs −7.25%). 3 months: PPV leads (9.71% vs −6.65%). 6 months: PPV leads (21.14% vs −9.66%). YTD: PPV leads (23.76% vs 6.37%). Size (TRY): PPV leads (419M vs 412.9M). Investors: ROF leads (224 vs 151). Risk: PPV leads (2 vs 7).

Frequently Asked Questions

Year to date PPV returned 23.76% and ROF returned 6.37%; over the last year PPV returned — and ROF returned 28.85%. Over the last month PPV returned 3.13% and ROF returned −7.25%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.

As of November 3, 2026, PPV has a size of TRY 419M with 151 investors, while ROF has a size of TRY 412.9M with 224 investors. PPV leads in size and ROF leads in investor count.

The CMB risk score of PPV is 2 out of 7 and that of ROF is 7. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.