PPS vs RPN Fund Comparison
Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of PPS (Phillip Portföy Birinci Serbest Fon) and RPN (Rota Portföy Nev Serbest Fon) side by side.
If you had invested TRY 10,000
Metric comparison
| Metric | PPS | RPN | Category median |
|---|---|---|---|
| Today (est.) | — | −1.56% | −1.97% |
| Daily | −3.41% | 0.78% | 0.19% |
| 1 week | −14.49% | −1.14% | 0.42% |
| 1 month | −0.26% | −4.44% | 0.94% |
| 3 months | 14.38% | −8.68% | 5.89% |
| 6 months | −21.88% | 0.95% | 12.86% |
| YTD | −6.50% | 9.07% | 18.07% |
| 1 year | 3.85% | 16.68% | 24.44% |
| 3 years | 165.57% | 33.61% | 111.64% |
Popular comparisons
Related pages
About the PPS vs RPN comparison
The price, returns, size and risk of PPS (Phillip Portföy Birinci Serbest Fon) and RPN (Rota Portföy Nev Serbest Fon) are compared side by side as of September 28, 2026. Of the 11 metrics compared, PPS leads in 5 and RPN leads in 6. PPS is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Phillip Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; RPN is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Rota Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..
Highlights: Daily: RPN leads (0.78% vs −3.41%). 1 week: RPN leads (−1.14% vs −14.49%). 1 month: PPS leads (−0.26% vs −4.44%). 3 months: PPS leads (14.38% vs −8.68%). 6 months: RPN leads (0.95% vs −21.88%). YTD: RPN leads (9.07% vs −6.50%). 1 year: RPN leads (16.68% vs 3.85%). 3 years: PPS leads (165.57% vs 33.61%). Size (TRY): PPS leads (795.1M vs 779.6M). Investors: PPS leads (1,648 vs 23). Risk: RPN leads (6 vs 7).
Frequently asked questions
Which earned more, PPS or RPN?
Year to date PPS returned −6.50% and RPN returned 9.07%; over the last year PPS returned 3.85% and RPN returned 16.68%. Over the last month PPS returned −0.26% and RPN returned −4.44%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.
Which is larger and which has more investors, PPS or RPN?
As of September 28, 2026, PPS has a size of TRY 795.1M with 1,648 investors, while RPN has a size of TRY 779.6M with 23 investors. PPS leads in size and PPS leads in investor count.
What do the risk scores of PPS and RPN mean?
The CMB risk score of PPS is 7 out of 7 and that of RPN is 6. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.