Yatırımcı.AI

PKT vs ZJI Fund Comparison

Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of PKT (Yapı Kredi Portföy Para Piyasası Katılım Serbest (TL) Fon) and ZJI (Ziraat Portföy İkinci Serbest (TL) Fon) side by side.

PKTZJI
StockFund

If You Had Invested TRY 10,000

Metric Comparison

PKT vs ZJI Fund Comparison
MetricPKTZJICategory median
Daily0.29%2.35%0.19%
1 week0.68%−0.84%0.42%
1 month3.15%−8.37%0.94%
3 months10.00%−4.04%5.89%
6 months21.80%−19.69%12.86%
YTD32.38%−24.42%18.07%
1 year46.20%−26.56%24.44%
3 years—197.16%111.64%
Returns are based on prices as of September 28, 2026; the fund with the higher return or the lower risk score counts as the leader.

Popular Comparisons

Related Pages

About the PKT vs ZJI Comparison

The price, returns, size and risk of PKT (Yapı Kredi Portföy Para Piyasası Katılım Serbest (TL) Fon) and ZJI (Ziraat Portföy İkinci Serbest (TL) Fon) are compared side by side as of September 28, 2026. Of the 10 metrics compared, PKT leads in 8 and ZJI leads in 2. PKT is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Yapı Kredi Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; ZJI is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Ziraat Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..

Highlights: Daily: ZJI leads (2.35% vs 0.29%). 1 week: PKT leads (0.68% vs −0.84%). 1 month: PKT leads (3.15% vs −8.37%). 3 months: PKT leads (10.00% vs −4.04%). 6 months: PKT leads (21.80% vs −19.69%). YTD: PKT leads (32.38% vs −24.42%). 1 year: PKT leads (46.20% vs −26.56%). Size (TRY): PKT leads (6.4B vs 6.2B). Investors: ZJI leads (1,461 vs 1,209). Risk: PKT leads (2 vs 7).

Frequently Asked Questions

Year to date PKT returned 32.38% and ZJI returned −24.42%; over the last year PKT returned 46.20% and ZJI returned −26.56%. Over the last month PKT returned 3.15% and ZJI returned −8.37%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.

As of September 28, 2026, PKT has a size of TRY 6.4B with 1,209 investors, while ZJI has a size of TRY 6.2B with 1,461 investors. PKT leads in size and ZJI leads in investor count.

The CMB risk score of PKT is 2 out of 7 and that of ZJI is 7. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.