Yatırımcı.AI

PDF vs RPX Fund Comparison

Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of PDF (Astra Portföy Birinci Serbest (Döviz) Fon) and RPX (Rota Portföy Üçüncü Serbest (Döviz) Fon) side by side.

PDFRPX
StockFund

If You Had Invested TRY 10,000

Metric Comparison

PDF vs RPX Fund Comparison
MetricPDFRPXCategory median
Daily0.10%0.06%0.07%
1 week0.56%0.39%0.51%
1 month2.59%1.65%1.66%
3 months5.42%5.06%3.04%
6 months12.37%11.24%8.17%
YTD19.42%19.24%17.49%
1 year22.91%21.87%21.23%
3 years105.87%98.32%105.57%
Returns are based on prices as of November 13, 2026; the fund with the higher return or the lower risk score counts as the leader.

Popular Comparisons

Popular Fund Comparisons

Related Pages

About the PDF vs RPX Comparison

The price, returns, size and risk of PDF (Astra Portföy Birinci Serbest (Döviz) Fon) and RPX (Rota Portföy Üçüncü Serbest (Döviz) Fon) are compared side by side as of November 13, 2026. Of the 10 metrics compared, PDF leads in 9 and RPX leads in 1. PDF is a Hedge Fund fund managed by QInvest Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; RPX is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Rota Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..

Highlights: Daily: PDF leads (0.10% vs 0.06%). 1 week: PDF leads (0.56% vs 0.39%). 1 month: PDF leads (2.59% vs 1.65%). 3 months: PDF leads (5.42% vs 5.06%). 6 months: PDF leads (12.37% vs 11.24%). YTD: PDF leads (19.42% vs 19.24%). 1 year: PDF leads (22.91% vs 21.87%). 3 years: PDF leads (105.87% vs 98.32%). Size (TRY): PDF leads (489.2M vs 485.6M). Investors: RPX leads (73 vs 42).

Frequently Asked Questions

Year to date PDF returned 19.42% and RPX returned 19.24%; over the last year PDF returned 22.91% and RPX returned 21.87%. Over the last month PDF returned 2.59% and RPX returned 1.65%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.

As of November 13, 2026, PDF has a size of TRY 489.2M with 42 investors, while RPX has a size of TRY 485.6M with 73 investors. PDF leads in size and RPX leads in investor count.

The CMB risk score of PDF is 5 out of 7 and that of RPX is —. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.