Yatırımcı.AI

OPD vs RDT Fund Comparison

Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of OPD (Osmanlı Portföy Anka Serbest Fon) and RDT (Phillip Portföy Rodosto Serbest Fon) side by side.

OPDRDT
StockFund

If You Had Invested TRY 10,000

Metric Comparison

OPD vs RDT Fund Comparison
MetricOPDRDTCategory median
Daily0.10%−0.52%0.05%
1 week0.67%−1.27%0.44%
1 month2.88%−0.30%0.38%
3 months9.24%4.40%3.95%
6 months19.96%−5.71%8.45%
YTD34.24%−15.49%16.06%
1 year44.23%−5.31%20.98%
3 years243.77%—107.86%
Returns are based on prices as of October 22, 2026; the fund with the higher return or the lower risk score counts as the leader.

Popular Comparisons

Popular Fund Comparisons

Related Pages

About the OPD vs RDT Comparison

The price, returns, size and risk of OPD (Osmanlı Portföy Anka Serbest Fon) and RDT (Phillip Portföy Rodosto Serbest Fon) are compared side by side as of October 22, 2026. Of the 10 metrics compared, OPD leads in 8 and RDT leads in 2. OPD is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Osmanlı Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; RDT is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Phillip Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..

Highlights: Daily: OPD leads (0.10% vs −0.52%). 1 week: OPD leads (0.67% vs −1.27%). 1 month: OPD leads (2.88% vs −0.30%). 3 months: OPD leads (9.24% vs 4.40%). 6 months: OPD leads (19.96% vs −5.71%). YTD: OPD leads (34.24% vs −15.49%). 1 year: OPD leads (44.23% vs −5.31%). Size (TRY): RDT leads (74.5M vs 69.2M). Investors: RDT leads (44 vs 13). Risk: OPD leads (2 vs 4).

Frequently Asked Questions

Year to date OPD returned 34.24% and RDT returned −15.49%; over the last year OPD returned 44.23% and RDT returned −5.31%. Over the last month OPD returned 2.88% and RDT returned −0.30%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.

As of October 22, 2026, OPD has a size of TRY 69.2M with 13 investors, while RDT has a size of TRY 74.5M with 44 investors. RDT leads in size and RDT leads in investor count.

The CMB risk score of OPD is 2 out of 7 and that of RDT is 4. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.