Yatırımcı.AI

ODP vs RLH Fund Comparison

Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of ODP (Osmanlı Portföy Birinci Serbest Fon) and RLH (Rota Portföy Yirminci Serbest Fon) side by side.

ODPRLH
StockFund

If You Had Invested TRY 10,000

Metric Comparison

ODP vs RLH Fund Comparison
MetricODPRLHCategory median
Daily−1.12%−0.16%−0.07%
1 week1.32%0.32%−0.29%
1 month5.97%1.93%0.00%
3 months9.94%8.18%4.33%
6 months47.92%18.07%11.90%
YTD41.13%37.45%14.97%
1 year55.47%47.16%21.27%
3 years275.44%—111.30%
Returns are based on prices as of September 29, 2026; the fund with the higher return or the lower risk score counts as the leader.

Popular Comparisons

Popular Fund Comparisons

Related Pages

About the ODP vs RLH Comparison

The price, returns, size and risk of ODP (Osmanlı Portföy Birinci Serbest Fon) and RLH (Rota Portföy Yirminci Serbest Fon) are compared side by side as of September 29, 2026. Of the 10 metrics compared, ODP leads in 8 and RLH leads in 2. ODP is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Osmanlı Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; RLH is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Rota Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..

Highlights: Daily: RLH leads (−0.16% vs −1.12%). 1 week: ODP leads (1.32% vs 0.32%). 1 month: ODP leads (5.97% vs 1.93%). 3 months: ODP leads (9.94% vs 8.18%). 6 months: ODP leads (47.92% vs 18.07%). YTD: ODP leads (41.13% vs 37.45%). 1 year: ODP leads (55.47% vs 47.16%). Size (TRY): ODP leads (271.4M vs 261.6M). Investors: ODP leads (123 vs 34). Risk: RLH leads (2 vs 6).

Frequently Asked Questions

Year to date ODP returned 41.13% and RLH returned 37.45%; over the last year ODP returned 55.47% and RLH returned 47.16%. Over the last month ODP returned 5.97% and RLH returned 1.93%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.

As of September 29, 2026, ODP has a size of TRY 271.4M with 123 investors, while RLH has a size of TRY 261.6M with 34 investors. ODP leads in size and ODP leads in investor count.

The CMB risk score of ODP is 6 out of 7 and that of RLH is 2. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.