Yatırımcı.AI

FBZ vs RLH Fund Comparison

Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of FBZ (Fiba Portföy Teknoloji Serbest Fon) and RLH (Rota Portföy Yirminci Serbest Fon) side by side.

FBZRLH
StockFund

If You Had Invested TRY 10,000

Metric Comparison

FBZ vs RLH Fund Comparison
MetricFBZRLHCategory median
Daily−0.55%−0.16%−0.07%
1 week0.87%0.32%−0.29%
1 month1.37%1.93%0.00%
3 months8.75%8.18%4.33%
6 months40.67%18.07%11.90%
YTD31.88%37.45%14.97%
1 year42.75%47.16%21.27%
3 years198.89%—111.30%
Returns are based on prices as of September 29, 2026; the fund with the higher return or the lower risk score counts as the leader.

Popular Comparisons

Popular Fund Comparisons

Related Pages

About the FBZ vs RLH Comparison

The price, returns, size and risk of FBZ (Fiba Portföy Teknoloji Serbest Fon) and RLH (Rota Portföy Yirminci Serbest Fon) are compared side by side as of September 29, 2026. Of the 10 metrics compared, FBZ leads in 5 and RLH leads in 5. FBZ is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Fiba Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; RLH is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Rota Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..

Highlights: Daily: RLH leads (−0.16% vs −0.55%). 1 week: FBZ leads (0.87% vs 0.32%). 1 month: RLH leads (1.93% vs 1.37%). 3 months: FBZ leads (8.75% vs 8.18%). 6 months: FBZ leads (40.67% vs 18.07%). YTD: RLH leads (37.45% vs 31.88%). 1 year: RLH leads (47.16% vs 42.75%). Size (TRY): FBZ leads (266.7M vs 261.6M). Investors: FBZ leads (368 vs 34). Risk: RLH leads (2 vs 6).

Frequently Asked Questions

Year to date FBZ returned 31.88% and RLH returned 37.45%; over the last year FBZ returned 42.75% and RLH returned 47.16%. Over the last month FBZ returned 1.37% and RLH returned 1.93%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.

As of September 29, 2026, FBZ has a size of TRY 266.7M with 368 investors, while RLH has a size of TRY 261.6M with 34 investors. FBZ leads in size and FBZ leads in investor count.

The CMB risk score of FBZ is 6 out of 7 and that of RLH is 2. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.