Yatırımcı.AI

GZE vs NZT Fund Comparison

Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of GZE (Garanti Portföy Emtia Serbest Fon) and NZT (Neo Portföy Para Piyasası Serbest Fon) side by side.

GZENZT
StockFund

If You Had Invested TRY 10,000

Metric Comparison

GZE vs NZT Fund Comparison
MetricGZENZTCategory median
Daily−0.42%0.09%0.01%
1 week−0.27%0.70%0.30%
1 month−1.14%3.00%0.00%
3 months9.14%9.80%3.96%
6 months12.10%21.03%8.18%
YTD28.88%35.53%15.73%
1 year44.11%45.64%20.69%
3 years148.77%259.88%105.65%
Returns are based on prices as of October 23, 2026; the fund with the higher return or the lower risk score counts as the leader.

Popular Comparisons

Popular Fund Comparisons

Related Pages

About the GZE vs NZT Comparison

The price, returns, size and risk of GZE (Garanti Portföy Emtia Serbest Fon) and NZT (Neo Portföy Para Piyasası Serbest Fon) are compared side by side as of October 23, 2026. Of the 11 metrics compared, GZE leads in 2 and NZT leads in 9. GZE is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Garanti Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; NZT is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Neo Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..

Highlights: Daily: NZT leads (0.09% vs −0.42%). 1 week: NZT leads (0.70% vs −0.27%). 1 month: NZT leads (3.00% vs −1.14%). 3 months: NZT leads (9.80% vs 9.14%). 6 months: NZT leads (21.03% vs 12.10%). YTD: NZT leads (35.53% vs 28.88%). 1 year: NZT leads (45.64% vs 44.11%). 3 years: NZT leads (259.88% vs 148.77%). Size (TRY): GZE leads (1.5B vs 1.5B). Investors: GZE leads (3,745 vs 289). Risk: NZT leads (2 vs 6).

Frequently Asked Questions

Year to date GZE returned 28.88% and NZT returned 35.53%; over the last year GZE returned 44.11% and NZT returned 45.64%. Over the last month GZE returned −1.14% and NZT returned 3.00%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.

As of October 23, 2026, GZE has a size of TRY 1.5B with 3,745 investors, while NZT has a size of TRY 1.5B with 289 investors. GZE leads in size and GZE leads in investor count.

The CMB risk score of GZE is 6 out of 7 and that of NZT is 2. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.