NVK vs RPS Fund Comparison
Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of NVK (Inveo Portföy Katılım Serbest (Döviz) Fon) and RPS (Rota Portföy Birinci Serbest (Döviz) Fon) side by side.
If You Had Invested TRY 10,000
Metric Comparison
| Metric | NVK | RPS | Category median |
|---|---|---|---|
| Daily | 0.07% | −0.02% | 0.01% |
| 1 week | 0.50% | 0.32% | 0.30% |
| 1 month | 2.00% | 1.32% | 0.00% |
| 3 months | 6.09% | 4.26% | 3.96% |
| 6 months | 12.05% | 8.90% | 8.18% |
| YTD | 16.79% | 15.92% | 15.73% |
| 1 year | 19.62% | 20.83% | 20.69% |
| 3 years | — | 110.95% | 105.65% |
Popular Comparisons
Popular Fund Comparisons
Related Pages
About the NVK vs RPS Comparison
The price, returns, size and risk of NVK (Inveo Portföy Katılım Serbest (Döviz) Fon) and RPS (Rota Portföy Birinci Serbest (Döviz) Fon) are compared side by side as of October 23, 2026. Of the 9 metrics compared, NVK leads in 6 and RPS leads in 3. NVK is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Inveo Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; RPS is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Rota Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..
Highlights: Daily: NVK leads (0.07% vs −0.02%). 1 week: NVK leads (0.50% vs 0.32%). 1 month: NVK leads (2.00% vs 1.32%). 3 months: NVK leads (6.09% vs 4.26%). 6 months: NVK leads (12.05% vs 8.90%). YTD: NVK leads (16.79% vs 15.92%). 1 year: RPS leads (20.83% vs 19.62%). Size (TRY): RPS leads (127.8M vs 125.2M). Investors: RPS leads (67 vs 11).
Frequently Asked Questions
Which earned more, NVK or RPS?
Year to date NVK returned 16.79% and RPS returned 15.92%; over the last year NVK returned 19.62% and RPS returned 20.83%. Over the last month NVK returned 2.00% and RPS returned 1.32%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.
Which is larger and which has more investors, NVK or RPS?
As of October 23, 2026, NVK has a size of TRY 125.2M with 11 investors, while RPS has a size of TRY 127.8M with 67 investors. RPS leads in size and RPS leads in investor count.
What do the risk scores of NVK and RPS mean?
The CMB risk score of NVK is — out of 7 and that of RPS is —. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.