IYV vs RPS Fund Comparison
Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of IYV (İstanbul Portföy Aşiyan Serbest Fon) and RPS (Rota Portföy Birinci Serbest (Döviz) Fon) side by side.
If You Had Invested TRY 10,000
Metric Comparison
| Metric | IYV | RPS | Category median |
|---|---|---|---|
| Today (est.) | −1.24% | — | −1.16% |
| Daily | −2.22% | −0.02% | 0.01% |
| 1 week | −4.35% | 0.32% | 0.30% |
| 1 month | −7.88% | 1.32% | 0.00% |
| 3 months | −7.41% | 4.26% | 3.96% |
| 6 months | −9.77% | 8.90% | 8.18% |
| YTD | 1.56% | 15.92% | 15.73% |
| 1 year | — | 20.83% | 20.69% |
| 3 years | — | 110.95% | 105.65% |
Popular Comparisons
Popular Fund Comparisons
Related Pages
About the IYV vs RPS Comparison
The price, returns, size and risk of IYV (İstanbul Portföy Aşiyan Serbest Fon) and RPS (Rota Portföy Birinci Serbest (Döviz) Fon) are compared side by side as of October 23, 2026. Of the 8 metrics compared, IYV leads in 1 and RPS leads in 7. IYV is a Hedge Fund fund managed by İstanbul Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; RPS is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Rota Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..
Highlights: Daily: RPS leads (−0.02% vs −2.22%). 1 week: RPS leads (0.32% vs −4.35%). 1 month: RPS leads (1.32% vs −7.88%). 3 months: RPS leads (4.26% vs −7.41%). 6 months: RPS leads (8.90% vs −9.77%). YTD: RPS leads (15.92% vs 1.56%). Size (TRY): IYV leads (129M vs 127.8M). Investors: RPS leads (67 vs 51).
Frequently Asked Questions
Which earned more, IYV or RPS?
Year to date IYV returned 1.56% and RPS returned 15.92%; over the last year IYV returned — and RPS returned 20.83%. Over the last month IYV returned −7.88% and RPS returned 1.32%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.
Which is larger and which has more investors, IYV or RPS?
As of October 23, 2026, IYV has a size of TRY 129M with 51 investors, while RPS has a size of TRY 127.8M with 67 investors. IYV leads in size and RPS leads in investor count.
What do the risk scores of IYV and RPS mean?
The CMB risk score of IYV is 6 out of 7 and that of RPS is —. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.