Yatırımcı.AI

NSK vs RPL Fund Comparison

Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of NSK (Neo Portföy Birinci Serbest Fon) and RPL (Re-Pie Portföy Algoritmik Stratejiler Serbest Fon) side by side.

NSKRPL
StockFund

If You Had Invested TRY 10,000

Metric Comparison

NSK vs RPL Fund Comparison
MetricNSKRPLCategory median
Daily0.14%−1.68%−0.07%
1 week0.68%−5.06%−0.29%
1 month3.81%−3.64%0.00%
3 months10.87%0.66%4.33%
6 months22.84%11.22%11.90%
YTD35.09%20.64%14.97%
1 year46.13%31.24%21.27%
3 years260.43%—111.30%
Returns are based on prices as of September 29, 2026; the fund with the higher return or the lower risk score counts as the leader.

Popular Comparisons

Popular Fund Comparisons

Related Pages

About the NSK vs RPL Comparison

The price, returns, size and risk of NSK (Neo Portföy Birinci Serbest Fon) and RPL (Re-Pie Portföy Algoritmik Stratejiler Serbest Fon) are compared side by side as of September 29, 2026. Of the 10 metrics compared, NSK leads in 9 and RPL leads in 1. NSK is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Neo Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; RPL is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Re-Pie Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..

Highlights: Daily: NSK leads (0.14% vs −1.68%). 1 week: NSK leads (0.68% vs −5.06%). 1 month: NSK leads (3.81% vs −3.64%). 3 months: NSK leads (10.87% vs 0.66%). 6 months: NSK leads (22.84% vs 11.22%). YTD: NSK leads (35.09% vs 20.64%). 1 year: NSK leads (46.13% vs 31.24%). Size (TRY): NSK leads (126.1M vs 117.8M). Investors: NSK leads (69 vs 10). Risk: RPL leads (2 vs 3).

Frequently Asked Questions

Year to date NSK returned 35.09% and RPL returned 20.64%; over the last year NSK returned 46.13% and RPL returned 31.24%. Over the last month NSK returned 3.81% and RPL returned −3.64%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.

As of September 29, 2026, NSK has a size of TRY 126.1M with 69 investors, while RPL has a size of TRY 117.8M with 10 investors. NSK leads in size and NSK leads in investor count.

The CMB risk score of NSK is 3 out of 7 and that of RPL is 2. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.