Yatırımcı.AI

AJK vs NSK Fund Comparison

Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of AJK (Ak Portföy 0-5 Yıl Vadeli Serbest (Döviz) Fon) and NSK (Neo Portföy Birinci Serbest Fon) side by side.

AJKNSK
StockFund

If You Had Invested TRY 10,000

Metric Comparison

AJK vs NSK Fund Comparison
MetricAJKNSKCategory median
Daily0.19%0.14%−0.07%
1 week0.36%0.68%−0.29%
1 month1.66%3.81%0.00%
3 months5.70%10.87%4.33%
6 months12.10%22.84%11.90%
YTD16.52%35.09%14.97%
1 year22.03%46.13%21.27%
3 years85.07%260.43%111.30%
Returns are based on prices as of September 29, 2026; the fund with the higher return or the lower risk score counts as the leader.

Popular Comparisons

Popular Fund Comparisons

Related Pages

About the AJK vs NSK Comparison

The price, returns, size and risk of AJK (Ak Portföy 0-5 Yıl Vadeli Serbest (Döviz) Fon) and NSK (Neo Portföy Birinci Serbest Fon) are compared side by side as of September 29, 2026. Of the 10 metrics compared, AJK leads in 3 and NSK leads in 7. AJK is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Ak Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; NSK is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Neo Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..

Highlights: Daily: AJK leads (0.19% vs 0.14%). 1 week: NSK leads (0.68% vs 0.36%). 1 month: NSK leads (3.81% vs 1.66%). 3 months: NSK leads (10.87% vs 5.70%). 6 months: NSK leads (22.84% vs 12.10%). YTD: NSK leads (35.09% vs 16.52%). 1 year: NSK leads (46.13% vs 22.03%). 3 years: NSK leads (260.43% vs 85.07%). Size (TRY): AJK leads (130.7M vs 126.1M). Investors: AJK leads (131 vs 69).

Frequently Asked Questions

Year to date AJK returned 16.52% and NSK returned 35.09%; over the last year AJK returned 22.03% and NSK returned 46.13%. Over the last month AJK returned 1.66% and NSK returned 3.81%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.

As of September 29, 2026, AJK has a size of TRY 130.7M with 131 investors, while NSK has a size of TRY 126.1M with 69 investors. AJK leads in size and AJK leads in investor count.

The CMB risk score of AJK is — out of 7 and that of NSK is 3. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.