Yatırımcı.AI

NSK vs ODS Fund Comparison

Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of NSK (Neo Portföy Birinci Serbest Fon) and ODS (Oyak Portföy İkinci Serbest (Döviz) Fon) side by side.

NSKODS
StockFund

If You Had Invested TRY 10,000

Metric Comparison

NSK vs ODS Fund Comparison
MetricNSKODSCategory median
Daily0.14%−0.15%−0.07%
1 week0.68%−0.50%−0.29%
1 month3.81%0.21%0.00%
3 months10.87%4.25%4.33%
6 months22.84%8.68%11.90%
YTD35.09%10.15%14.97%
1 year46.13%14.34%21.27%
3 years260.43%105.77%111.30%
Returns are based on prices as of September 29, 2026; the fund with the higher return or the lower risk score counts as the leader.

Popular Comparisons

Popular Fund Comparisons

Related Pages

About the NSK vs ODS Comparison

The price, returns, size and risk of NSK (Neo Portföy Birinci Serbest Fon) and ODS (Oyak Portföy İkinci Serbest (Döviz) Fon) are compared side by side as of September 29, 2026. Of the 10 metrics compared, NSK leads in 9 and ODS leads in 1. NSK is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Neo Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; ODS is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Oyak Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..

Highlights: Daily: NSK leads (0.14% vs −0.15%). 1 week: NSK leads (0.68% vs −0.50%). 1 month: NSK leads (3.81% vs 0.21%). 3 months: NSK leads (10.87% vs 4.25%). 6 months: NSK leads (22.84% vs 8.68%). YTD: NSK leads (35.09% vs 10.15%). 1 year: NSK leads (46.13% vs 14.34%). 3 years: NSK leads (260.43% vs 105.77%). Size (TRY): NSK leads (126.1M vs 116.2M). Investors: ODS leads (95 vs 69).

Frequently Asked Questions

Year to date NSK returned 35.09% and ODS returned 10.15%; over the last year NSK returned 46.13% and ODS returned 14.34%. Over the last month NSK returned 3.81% and ODS returned 0.21%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.

As of September 29, 2026, NSK has a size of TRY 126.1M with 69 investors, while ODS has a size of TRY 116.2M with 95 investors. NSK leads in size and ODS leads in investor count.

The CMB risk score of NSK is 3 out of 7 and that of ODS is —. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.