Yatırımcı.AI

IPB vs VVZ Fund Comparison

Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of IPB (İstanbul Portföy Birinci Değişken Fon) and VVZ (AgeSA Hayat ve Emeklilik A.Ş. OKS Agresif Katılım Değişken Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) side by side.

IPBVVZ
StockFund

If You Had Invested TRY 10,000

Metric Comparison

IPB vs VVZ Fund Comparison
MetricIPBVVZCategory median
Today (est.)−1.39%—−2.06%
Daily−0.94%−1.26%−0.41%
1 week−4.23%−3.41%−1.69%
1 month−9.70%−6.08%−3.34%
3 months−20.50%−3.40%0.00%
6 months−18.55%0.07%4.10%
YTD4.00%26.04%21.58%
1 year2.70%36.02%30.90%
3 years102.37%165.79%160.42%
Returns are based on prices as of October 22, 2026; the fund with the higher return or the lower risk score counts as the leader. Today (est.): live estimated return of funds with at least 50% coverage, last calculated Oct 22, 2026, 22:16.

Popular Comparisons

Popular Fund Comparisons

Related Pages

About the IPB vs VVZ Comparison

The price, returns, size and risk of IPB (İstanbul Portföy Birinci Değişken Fon) and VVZ (AgeSA Hayat ve Emeklilik A.Ş. OKS Agresif Katılım Değişken Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) are compared side by side as of October 22, 2026. Of the 10 metrics compared, IPB leads in 2 and VVZ leads in 8. IPB is a Variable Fund fund managed by İstanbul Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; VVZ is a Variable Fund fund managed by AgeSA Hayat ve Emeklilik A.Ş..

Highlights: Daily: IPB leads (−0.94% vs −1.26%). 1 week: VVZ leads (−3.41% vs −4.23%). 1 month: VVZ leads (−6.08% vs −9.70%). 3 months: VVZ leads (−3.40% vs −20.50%). 6 months: VVZ leads (0.07% vs −18.55%). YTD: VVZ leads (26.04% vs 4.00%). 1 year: VVZ leads (36.02% vs 2.70%). 3 years: VVZ leads (165.79% vs 102.37%). Size (TRY): VVZ leads (602M vs 577.9M). Investors: IPB leads (12,383 vs 6,276).

Frequently Asked Questions

Year to date IPB returned 4.00% and VVZ returned 26.04%; over the last year IPB returned 2.70% and VVZ returned 36.02%. Over the last month IPB returned −9.70% and VVZ returned −6.08%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.

As of October 22, 2026, IPB has a size of TRY 577.9M with 12,383 investors, while VVZ has a size of TRY 602M with 6,276 investors. VVZ leads in size and IPB leads in investor count.

The CMB risk score of IPB is 6 out of 7 and that of VVZ is 6. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.