Yatırımcı.AI

NHM vs ZDZ Fund Comparison

Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of NHM (Zurich Yaşam ve Emeklilik A.Ş. Temkinli Değişken Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) and ZDZ (Ziraat Portföy Agresif Değişken Fon) side by side.

NHMZDZ
StockFund

If You Had Invested TRY 10,000

Metric Comparison

NHM vs ZDZ Fund Comparison
MetricNHMZDZCategory median
Daily−0.02%−5.38%−1.41%
1 week0.55%−8.13%−0.69%
1 month1.08%−21.69%−3.96%
3 months4.06%−35.03%−1.43%
6 months13.23%−36.26%1.85%
YTD29.15%−30.80%17.97%
1 year34.47%−35.96%23.69%
3 years199.14%19.05%149.99%
Returns are based on prices as of November 2, 2026; the fund with the higher return or the lower risk score counts as the leader.

Popular Comparisons

Popular Fund Comparisons

Related Pages

About the NHM vs ZDZ Comparison

The price, returns, size and risk of NHM (Zurich Yaşam ve Emeklilik A.Ş. Temkinli Değişken Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) and ZDZ (Ziraat Portföy Agresif Değişken Fon) are compared side by side as of November 2, 2026. Of the 11 metrics compared, NHM leads in 11 and ZDZ leads in 0. NHM is a Variable Fund fund managed by NN Hayat ve Emeklilik A.Ş.; ZDZ is a Variable Fund fund managed by Ziraat Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..

Highlights: Daily: NHM leads (−0.02% vs −5.38%). 1 week: NHM leads (0.55% vs −8.13%). 1 month: NHM leads (1.08% vs −21.69%). 3 months: NHM leads (4.06% vs −35.03%). 6 months: NHM leads (13.23% vs −36.26%). YTD: NHM leads (29.15% vs −30.80%). 1 year: NHM leads (34.47% vs −35.96%). 3 years: NHM leads (199.14% vs 19.05%). Size (TRY): NHM leads (623.9M vs 593.9M). Investors: NHM leads (8,766 vs 7,834). Risk: NHM leads (2 vs 6).

Frequently Asked Questions

Year to date NHM returned 29.15% and ZDZ returned −30.80%; over the last year NHM returned 34.47% and ZDZ returned −35.96%. Over the last month NHM returned 1.08% and ZDZ returned −21.69%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.

As of November 2, 2026, NHM has a size of TRY 623.9M with 8,766 investors, while ZDZ has a size of TRY 593.9M with 7,834 investors. NHM leads in size and NHM leads in investor count.

The CMB risk score of NHM is 2 out of 7 and that of ZDZ is 6. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.