Yatırımcı.AI

MPP vs ODP Fund Comparison

Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of MPP (Meksa Portföy Prime Serbest Fon) and ODP (Osmanlı Portföy Birinci Serbest Fon) side by side.

MPPODP
StockFund

If You Had Invested TRY 10,000

Metric Comparison

MPP vs ODP Fund Comparison
MetricMPPODPCategory median
Daily0.52%0.90%0.05%
1 week−1.06%−2.75%0.44%
1 month−3.52%−2.28%0.38%
3 months−1.73%7.34%3.95%
6 months−3.67%22.80%8.45%
YTD8.88%36.10%16.06%
1 year9.62%44.40%20.98%
3 years99.43%257.60%107.86%
Returns are based on prices as of October 22, 2026; the fund with the higher return or the lower risk score counts as the leader.

Popular Comparisons

Popular Fund Comparisons

Related Pages

About the MPP vs ODP Comparison

The price, returns, size and risk of MPP (Meksa Portföy Prime Serbest Fon) and ODP (Osmanlı Portföy Birinci Serbest Fon) are compared side by side as of October 22, 2026. Of the 11 metrics compared, MPP leads in 3 and ODP leads in 8. MPP is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Meksa Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; ODP is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Osmanlı Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..

Highlights: Daily: ODP leads (0.90% vs 0.52%). 1 week: MPP leads (−1.06% vs −2.75%). 1 month: ODP leads (−2.28% vs −3.52%). 3 months: ODP leads (7.34% vs −1.73%). 6 months: ODP leads (22.80% vs −3.67%). YTD: ODP leads (36.10% vs 8.88%). 1 year: ODP leads (44.40% vs 9.62%). 3 years: ODP leads (257.60% vs 99.43%). Size (TRY): MPP leads (287.9M vs 280M). Investors: MPP leads (951 vs 141). Risk: ODP leads (6 vs 7).

Frequently Asked Questions

Year to date MPP returned 8.88% and ODP returned 36.10%; over the last year MPP returned 9.62% and ODP returned 44.40%. Over the last month MPP returned −3.52% and ODP returned −2.28%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.

As of October 22, 2026, MPP has a size of TRY 287.9M with 951 investors, while ODP has a size of TRY 280M with 141 investors. MPP leads in size and MPP leads in investor count.

The CMB risk score of MPP is 7 out of 7 and that of ODP is 6. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.