Yatırımcı.AI

KPD vs MPP Fund Comparison

Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of KPD (Kuveyt Türk Portföy Kar Payı Ödeyen Katılım Serbest (Döviz) Fon) and MPP (Meksa Portföy Prime Serbest Fon) side by side.

KPDMPP
StockFund

If You Had Invested TRY 10,000

Metric Comparison

KPD vs MPP Fund Comparison
MetricKPDMPPCategory median
Daily−0.03%0.54%0.19%
1 week−0.12%1.91%0.42%
1 month−0.14%2.40%0.94%
3 months3.10%−1.84%5.89%
6 months9.27%13.04%12.86%
YTD10.02%13.77%18.07%
1 year15.05%15.32%24.44%
3 years—120.63%111.64%
Returns are based on prices as of September 28, 2026; the fund with the higher return or the lower risk score counts as the leader.

Popular Comparisons

Related Pages

About the KPD vs MPP Comparison

The price, returns, size and risk of KPD (Kuveyt Türk Portföy Kar Payı Ödeyen Katılım Serbest (Döviz) Fon) and MPP (Meksa Portföy Prime Serbest Fon) are compared side by side as of September 28, 2026. Of the 10 metrics compared, KPD leads in 2 and MPP leads in 8. KPD is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Kuveyt Türk Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; MPP is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Meksa Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..

Highlights: Daily: MPP leads (0.54% vs −0.03%). 1 week: MPP leads (1.91% vs −0.12%). 1 month: MPP leads (2.40% vs −0.14%). 3 months: KPD leads (3.10% vs −1.84%). 6 months: MPP leads (13.04% vs 9.27%). YTD: MPP leads (13.77% vs 10.02%). 1 year: MPP leads (15.32% vs 15.05%). Size (TRY): MPP leads (319.9M vs 304.6M). Investors: MPP leads (1,027 vs 523). Risk: KPD leads (0 vs 7).

Frequently Asked Questions

Year to date KPD returned 10.02% and MPP returned 13.77%; over the last year KPD returned 15.05% and MPP returned 15.32%. Over the last month KPD returned −0.14% and MPP returned 2.40%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.

As of September 28, 2026, KPD has a size of TRY 304.6M with 523 investors, while MPP has a size of TRY 319.9M with 1,027 investors. MPP leads in size and MPP leads in investor count.

The CMB risk score of KPD is 0 out of 7 and that of MPP is 7. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.