Yatırımcı.AI

MPP vs NVZ Fund Comparison

Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of MPP (Meksa Portföy Prime Serbest Fon) and NVZ (Neo Portföy Orsa Serbest (Döviz) Fon) side by side.

MPPNVZ
StockFund

If You Had Invested TRY 10,000

Metric Comparison

MPP vs NVZ Fund Comparison
MetricMPPNVZCategory median
Daily0.52%0.11%0.05%
1 week−1.06%0.70%0.44%
1 month−3.52%−0.21%0.38%
3 months−1.73%4.27%3.95%
6 months−3.67%7.56%8.45%
YTD8.88%14.77%16.06%
1 year9.62%19.77%20.98%
3 years99.43%110.28%107.86%
Returns are based on prices as of October 22, 2026; the fund with the higher return or the lower risk score counts as the leader.

Popular Comparisons

Popular Fund Comparisons

Related Pages

About the MPP vs NVZ Comparison

The price, returns, size and risk of MPP (Meksa Portföy Prime Serbest Fon) and NVZ (Neo Portföy Orsa Serbest (Döviz) Fon) are compared side by side as of October 22, 2026. Of the 11 metrics compared, MPP leads in 2 and NVZ leads in 9. MPP is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Meksa Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; NVZ is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Neo Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..

Highlights: Daily: MPP leads (0.52% vs 0.11%). 1 week: NVZ leads (0.70% vs −1.06%). 1 month: NVZ leads (−0.21% vs −3.52%). 3 months: NVZ leads (4.27% vs −1.73%). 6 months: NVZ leads (7.56% vs −3.67%). YTD: NVZ leads (14.77% vs 8.88%). 1 year: NVZ leads (19.77% vs 9.62%). 3 years: NVZ leads (110.28% vs 99.43%). Size (TRY): NVZ leads (295.5M vs 287.9M). Investors: MPP leads (951 vs 193). Risk: NVZ leads (5 vs 7).

Frequently Asked Questions

Year to date MPP returned 8.88% and NVZ returned 14.77%; over the last year MPP returned 9.62% and NVZ returned 19.77%. Over the last month MPP returned −3.52% and NVZ returned −0.21%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.

As of October 22, 2026, MPP has a size of TRY 287.9M with 951 investors, while NVZ has a size of TRY 295.5M with 193 investors. NVZ leads in size and MPP leads in investor count.

The CMB risk score of MPP is 7 out of 7 and that of NVZ is 5. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.