Yatırımcı.AI

KPD vs NVZ Fund Comparison

Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of KPD (Kuveyt Türk Portföy Kar Payı Ödeyen Katılım Serbest (Döviz) Fon) and NVZ (Neo Portföy Orsa Serbest (Döviz) Fon) side by side.

KPDNVZ
StockFund

If You Had Invested TRY 10,000

Metric Comparison

KPD vs NVZ Fund Comparison
MetricKPDNVZCategory median
Daily0.17%0.11%0.05%
1 week0.66%0.70%0.44%
1 month1.15%−0.21%0.38%
3 months3.52%4.27%3.95%
6 months7.64%7.56%8.45%
YTD11.31%14.77%16.06%
1 year14.94%19.77%20.98%
3 years—110.28%107.86%
Returns are based on prices as of October 22, 2026; the fund with the higher return or the lower risk score counts as the leader.

Popular Comparisons

Popular Fund Comparisons

Related Pages

About the KPD vs NVZ Comparison

The price, returns, size and risk of KPD (Kuveyt Türk Portföy Kar Payı Ödeyen Katılım Serbest (Döviz) Fon) and NVZ (Neo Portföy Orsa Serbest (Döviz) Fon) are compared side by side as of October 22, 2026. Of the 9 metrics compared, KPD leads in 4 and NVZ leads in 5. KPD is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Kuveyt Türk Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; NVZ is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Neo Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..

Highlights: Daily: KPD leads (0.17% vs 0.11%). 1 week: NVZ leads (0.70% vs 0.66%). 1 month: KPD leads (1.15% vs −0.21%). 3 months: NVZ leads (4.27% vs 3.52%). 6 months: KPD leads (7.64% vs 7.56%). YTD: NVZ leads (14.77% vs 11.31%). 1 year: NVZ leads (19.77% vs 14.94%). Size (TRY): NVZ leads (295.5M vs 288M). Investors: KPD leads (513 vs 193).

Frequently Asked Questions

Year to date KPD returned 11.31% and NVZ returned 14.77%; over the last year KPD returned 14.94% and NVZ returned 19.77%. Over the last month KPD returned 1.15% and NVZ returned −0.21%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.

As of October 22, 2026, KPD has a size of TRY 288M with 513 investors, while NVZ has a size of TRY 295.5M with 193 investors. NVZ leads in size and KPD leads in investor count.

The CMB risk score of KPD is — out of 7 and that of NVZ is 5. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.