MPN vs PKP Fund Comparison
Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of MPN (Aktif Portföy İkinci Aktif Serbest (Döviz) Fon) and PKP (Ata Portföy Para Piyasası Katılım Serbest Fon) side by side.
If you had invested TRY 10,000
Metric comparison
| Metric | MPN | PKP | Category median |
|---|---|---|---|
| Daily | −0.33% | 0.30% | 0.19% |
| 1 week | −0.37% | 0.70% | 0.42% |
| 1 month | −0.76% | 3.18% | 0.94% |
| 3 months | 3.14% | 10.11% | 5.89% |
| 6 months | 10.55% | 21.53% | 12.86% |
| YTD | 12.34% | 30.56% | 18.07% |
| 1 year | 18.50% | — | 24.44% |
| 3 years | 126.03% | — | 111.64% |
Popular comparisons
Related pages
About the MPN vs PKP comparison
The price, returns, size and risk of MPN (Aktif Portföy İkinci Aktif Serbest (Döviz) Fon) and PKP (Ata Portföy Para Piyasası Katılım Serbest Fon) are compared side by side as of September 28, 2026. Of the 9 metrics compared, MPN leads in 2 and PKP leads in 7. MPN is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Aktif Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; PKP is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Ata Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..
Highlights: Daily: PKP leads (0.30% vs −0.33%). 1 week: PKP leads (0.70% vs −0.37%). 1 month: PKP leads (3.18% vs −0.76%). 3 months: PKP leads (10.11% vs 3.14%). 6 months: PKP leads (21.53% vs 10.55%). YTD: PKP leads (30.56% vs 12.34%). Size (TRY): PKP leads (353M vs 350.2M). Investors: MPN leads (251 vs 63). Risk: MPN leads (0 vs 1).
Frequently asked questions
Which earned more, MPN or PKP?
Year to date MPN returned 12.34% and PKP returned 30.56%; over the last year MPN returned 18.50% and PKP returned —. Over the last month MPN returned −0.76% and PKP returned 3.18%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.
Which is larger and which has more investors, MPN or PKP?
As of September 28, 2026, MPN has a size of TRY 350.2M with 251 investors, while PKP has a size of TRY 353M with 63 investors. PKP leads in size and MPN leads in investor count.
What do the risk scores of MPN and PKP mean?
The CMB risk score of MPN is 0 out of 7 and that of PKP is 1. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.