FJB vs PKP Fund Comparison
Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of FJB (Fiba Portföy Blok Zinciri Teknolojileri Serbest Fon) and PKP (Ata Portföy Para Piyasası Katılım Serbest Fon) side by side.
If you had invested TRY 10,000
Metric comparison
| Metric | FJB | PKP | Category median |
|---|---|---|---|
| Daily | 0.64% | 0.30% | 0.19% |
| 1 week | 2.92% | 0.70% | 0.42% |
| 1 month | 4.02% | 3.18% | 0.94% |
| 3 months | 9.50% | 10.11% | 5.89% |
| 6 months | 40.00% | 21.53% | 12.86% |
| YTD | 31.52% | 30.56% | 18.07% |
| 1 year | 34.22% | — | 24.44% |
| 3 years | 301.57% | — | 111.64% |
Popular comparisons
Related pages
About the FJB vs PKP comparison
The price, returns, size and risk of FJB (Fiba Portföy Blok Zinciri Teknolojileri Serbest Fon) and PKP (Ata Portföy Para Piyasası Katılım Serbest Fon) are compared side by side as of September 28, 2026. Of the 9 metrics compared, FJB leads in 6 and PKP leads in 3. FJB is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Fiba Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; PKP is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Ata Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..
Highlights: Daily: FJB leads (0.64% vs 0.30%). 1 week: FJB leads (2.92% vs 0.70%). 1 month: FJB leads (4.02% vs 3.18%). 3 months: PKP leads (10.11% vs 9.50%). 6 months: FJB leads (40.00% vs 21.53%). YTD: FJB leads (31.52% vs 30.56%). Size (TRY): PKP leads (353M vs 348.2M). Investors: FJB leads (666 vs 63). Risk: PKP leads (1 vs 6).
Frequently asked questions
Which earned more, FJB or PKP?
Year to date FJB returned 31.52% and PKP returned 30.56%; over the last year FJB returned 34.22% and PKP returned —. Over the last month FJB returned 4.02% and PKP returned 3.18%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.
Which is larger and which has more investors, FJB or PKP?
As of September 28, 2026, FJB has a size of TRY 348.2M with 666 investors, while PKP has a size of TRY 353M with 63 investors. PKP leads in size and FJB leads in investor count.
What do the risk scores of FJB and PKP mean?
The CMB risk score of FJB is 6 out of 7 and that of PKP is 1. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.