MOZ vs PJP Fund Comparison
Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of MOZ (Emaa Blue Portföy Mozaik Serbest Fon) and PJP (Perform Portföy Birinci Serbest (Döviz) Fon) side by side.
If You Had Invested TRY 10,000
Metric Comparison
| Metric | MOZ | PJP | Category median |
|---|---|---|---|
| Daily | −0.27% | 0.12% | 0.09% |
| 1 week | 1.03% | 0.63% | 0.53% |
| 1 month | 1.20% | 0.50% | 0.00% |
| 3 months | 7.38% | 4.71% | 3.74% |
| 6 months | 19.22% | 11.79% | 9.91% |
| YTD | 24.89% | 17.25% | 15.04% |
| 1 year | — | −0.16% | 20.96% |
| 3 years | — | 75.22% | 107.79% |
Popular Comparisons
Popular Fund Comparisons
Related Pages
About the MOZ vs PJP Comparison
The price, returns, size and risk of MOZ (Emaa Blue Portföy Mozaik Serbest Fon) and PJP (Perform Portföy Birinci Serbest (Döviz) Fon) are compared side by side as of October 9, 2026. Of the 9 metrics compared, MOZ leads in 7 and PJP leads in 2. MOZ is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Emaa Blue Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; PJP is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Perform Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..
Highlights: Daily: PJP leads (0.12% vs −0.27%). 1 week: MOZ leads (1.03% vs 0.63%). 1 month: MOZ leads (1.20% vs 0.50%). 3 months: MOZ leads (7.38% vs 4.71%). 6 months: MOZ leads (19.22% vs 11.79%). YTD: MOZ leads (24.89% vs 17.25%). Size (TRY): PJP leads (408.2M vs 394.8M). Investors: MOZ leads (95 vs 8). Risk: MOZ leads (5 vs 6).
Frequently Asked Questions
Which earned more, MOZ or PJP?
Year to date MOZ returned 24.89% and PJP returned 17.25%; over the last year MOZ returned — and PJP returned −0.16%. Over the last month MOZ returned 1.20% and PJP returned 0.50%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.
Which is larger and which has more investors, MOZ or PJP?
As of October 9, 2026, MOZ has a size of TRY 394.8M with 95 investors, while PJP has a size of TRY 408.2M with 8 investors. PJP leads in size and MOZ leads in investor count.
What do the risk scores of MOZ and PJP mean?
The CMB risk score of MOZ is 5 out of 7 and that of PJP is 6. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.