Yatırımcı.AI

GZM vs PJP Fund Comparison

Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of GZM (Global MD Portföy Duru Serbest Fon) and PJP (Perform Portföy Birinci Serbest (Döviz) Fon) side by side.

GZMPJP
StockFund

If You Had Invested TRY 10,000

Metric Comparison

GZM vs PJP Fund Comparison
MetricGZMPJPCategory median
Daily0.38%0.12%0.09%
1 week1.63%0.63%0.53%
1 month4.74%0.50%0.00%
3 months14.98%4.71%3.74%
6 months37.20%11.79%9.91%
YTD73.15%17.25%15.04%
1 year53.59%−0.16%20.96%
3 years50.96%75.22%107.79%
Returns are based on prices as of October 9, 2026; the fund with the higher return or the lower risk score counts as the leader.

Popular Comparisons

Popular Fund Comparisons

Related Pages

About the GZM vs PJP Comparison

The price, returns, size and risk of GZM (Global MD Portföy Duru Serbest Fon) and PJP (Perform Portföy Birinci Serbest (Döviz) Fon) are compared side by side as of October 9, 2026. Of the 11 metrics compared, GZM leads in 9 and PJP leads in 2. GZM is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Global MD Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; PJP is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Perform Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..

Highlights: Daily: GZM leads (0.38% vs 0.12%). 1 week: GZM leads (1.63% vs 0.63%). 1 month: GZM leads (4.74% vs 0.50%). 3 months: GZM leads (14.98% vs 4.71%). 6 months: GZM leads (37.20% vs 11.79%). YTD: GZM leads (73.15% vs 17.25%). 1 year: GZM leads (53.59% vs −0.16%). 3 years: PJP leads (75.22% vs 50.96%). Size (TRY): GZM leads (408.5M vs 408.2M). Investors: GZM leads (797 vs 8). Risk: PJP leads (6 vs 7).

Frequently Asked Questions

Year to date GZM returned 73.15% and PJP returned 17.25%; over the last year GZM returned 53.59% and PJP returned −0.16%. Over the last month GZM returned 4.74% and PJP returned 0.50%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.

As of October 9, 2026, GZM has a size of TRY 408.5M with 797 investors, while PJP has a size of TRY 408.2M with 8 investors. GZM leads in size and GZM leads in investor count.

The CMB risk score of GZM is 7 out of 7 and that of PJP is 6. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.