GTY vs MOZ Fund Comparison
Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of GTY (Garanti Portföy Trend Serbest Fon) and MOZ (Emaa Blue Portföy Mozaik Serbest Fon) side by side.
If You Had Invested TRY 10,000
Metric Comparison
| Metric | GTY | MOZ | Category median |
|---|---|---|---|
| Daily | −0.43% | −0.27% | 0.09% |
| 1 week | −0.32% | 1.03% | 0.53% |
| 1 month | −2.63% | 1.20% | 0.00% |
| 3 months | 2.87% | 7.38% | 3.74% |
| 6 months | 12.76% | 19.22% | 9.91% |
| YTD | 19.72% | 24.89% | 15.04% |
| 1 year | 28.73% | — | 20.96% |
| 3 years | 155.39% | — | 107.79% |
Popular Comparisons
Popular Fund Comparisons
Related Pages
About the GTY vs MOZ Comparison
The price, returns, size and risk of GTY (Garanti Portföy Trend Serbest Fon) and MOZ (Emaa Blue Portföy Mozaik Serbest Fon) are compared side by side as of October 9, 2026. Of the 9 metrics compared, GTY leads in 1 and MOZ leads in 8. GTY is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Garanti Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; MOZ is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Emaa Blue Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..
Highlights: Daily: MOZ leads (−0.27% vs −0.43%). 1 week: MOZ leads (1.03% vs −0.32%). 1 month: MOZ leads (1.20% vs −2.63%). 3 months: MOZ leads (7.38% vs 2.87%). 6 months: MOZ leads (19.22% vs 12.76%). YTD: MOZ leads (24.89% vs 19.72%). Size (TRY): MOZ leads (394.8M vs 387.3M). Investors: GTY leads (437 vs 95). Risk: MOZ leads (5 vs 6).
Frequently Asked Questions
Which earned more, GTY or MOZ?
Year to date GTY returned 19.72% and MOZ returned 24.89%; over the last year GTY returned 28.73% and MOZ returned —. Over the last month GTY returned −2.63% and MOZ returned 1.20%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.
Which is larger and which has more investors, GTY or MOZ?
As of October 9, 2026, GTY has a size of TRY 387.3M with 437 investors, while MOZ has a size of TRY 394.8M with 95 investors. MOZ leads in size and GTY leads in investor count.
What do the risk scores of GTY and MOZ mean?
The CMB risk score of GTY is 6 out of 7 and that of MOZ is 5. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.