Yatırımcı.AI

MHU vs ODG Fund Comparison

Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of MHU (MetLife Emeklilik ve Hayat A.Ş. OKS Atak Katılım Değişken Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) and ODG (One Portföy İkinci Değişken Fon) side by side.

MHUODG
StockFund

If You Had Invested TRY 10,000

Metric Comparison

MHU vs ODG Fund Comparison
MetricMHUODGCategory median
Daily−1.11%0.09%−0.83%
1 week−1.18%0.72%−0.98%
1 month−3.35%−0.90%−1.82%
3 months2.20%7.17%3.78%
6 months13.82%—14.04%
YTD27.21%18.41%24.40%
1 year31.04%—34.17%
3 years169.04%—157.59%
Returns are based on prices as of September 29, 2026; the fund with the higher return or the lower risk score counts as the leader.

Popular Comparisons

Popular Fund Comparisons

Related Pages

About the MHU vs ODG Comparison

The price, returns, size and risk of MHU (MetLife Emeklilik ve Hayat A.Ş. OKS Atak Katılım Değişken Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) and ODG (One Portföy İkinci Değişken Fon) are compared side by side as of September 29, 2026. Of the 8 metrics compared, MHU leads in 2 and ODG leads in 6. MHU is a Variable Fund fund managed by MetLife Emeklilik ve Hayat A.Ş.; ODG is a Variable Fund fund managed by One Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..

Highlights: Daily: ODG leads (0.09% vs −1.11%). 1 week: ODG leads (0.72% vs −1.18%). 1 month: ODG leads (−0.90% vs −3.35%). 3 months: ODG leads (7.17% vs 2.20%). YTD: MHU leads (27.21% vs 18.41%). Size (TRY): ODG leads (35.2M vs 34.8M). Investors: MHU leads (512 vs 22). Risk: ODG leads (3 vs 5).

Frequently Asked Questions

Year to date MHU returned 27.21% and ODG returned 18.41%; over the last year MHU returned 31.04% and ODG returned —. Over the last month MHU returned −3.35% and ODG returned −0.90%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.

As of September 29, 2026, MHU has a size of TRY 34.8M with 512 investors, while ODG has a size of TRY 35.2M with 22 investors. ODG leads in size and MHU leads in investor count.

The CMB risk score of MHU is 5 out of 7 and that of ODG is 3. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.