MET vs ZFB Fund Comparison
Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of MET (Garanti Portföy Metaverse ve Yeni Teknolojiler Değişken Fon) and ZFB (Ak Portföy Fintek ve Blokzinciri Teknolojileri Değişken Fon) side by side.
If You Had Invested TRY 10,000
Metric Comparison
| Metric | MET | ZFB | Category median |
|---|---|---|---|
| Daily | 2.06% | 0.26% | 1.07% |
| 1 week | 2.20% | −2.31% | 2.38% |
| 1 month | −6.51% | −12.36% | −0.76% |
| 3 months | −2.22% | −14.29% | 0.00% |
| 6 months | 1.60% | −14.32% | 0.00% |
| YTD | 25.59% | 11.59% | 22.39% |
| 1 year | 30.66% | 15.88% | 28.39% |
| 3 years | 210.52% | 249.39% | 154.30% |
Popular Comparisons
Popular Fund Comparisons
Related Pages
About the MET vs ZFB Comparison
The price, returns, size and risk of MET (Garanti Portföy Metaverse ve Yeni Teknolojiler Değişken Fon) and ZFB (Ak Portföy Fintek ve Blokzinciri Teknolojileri Değişken Fon) are compared side by side as of November 10, 2026. Of the 10 metrics compared, MET leads in 7 and ZFB leads in 3. MET is a Variable Fund fund managed by Garanti Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; ZFB is a Variable Fund fund managed by Ak Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..
Highlights: Daily: MET leads (2.06% vs 0.26%). 1 week: MET leads (2.20% vs −2.31%). 1 month: MET leads (−6.51% vs −12.36%). 3 months: MET leads (−2.22% vs −14.29%). 6 months: MET leads (1.60% vs −14.32%). YTD: MET leads (25.59% vs 11.59%). 1 year: MET leads (30.66% vs 15.88%). 3 years: ZFB leads (249.39% vs 210.52%). Size (TRY): ZFB leads (773.2M vs 764.8M). Investors: ZFB leads (13,355 vs 6,136).
Frequently Asked Questions
Which earned more, MET or ZFB?
Year to date MET returned 25.59% and ZFB returned 11.59%; over the last year MET returned 30.66% and ZFB returned 15.88%. Over the last month MET returned −6.51% and ZFB returned −12.36%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.
Which is larger and which has more investors, MET or ZFB?
As of November 10, 2026, MET has a size of TRY 764.8M with 6,136 investors, while ZFB has a size of TRY 773.2M with 13,355 investors. ZFB leads in size and ZFB leads in investor count.
What do the risk scores of MET and ZFB mean?
The CMB risk score of MET is 6 out of 7 and that of ZFB is 6. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.