FID vs MET Fund Comparison
Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of FID (Fiba Portföy Çoklu Varlık İkinci Değişken Fon) and MET (Garanti Portföy Metaverse ve Yeni Teknolojiler Değişken Fon) side by side.
If You Had Invested TRY 10,000
Metric Comparison
| Metric | FID | MET | Category median |
|---|---|---|---|
| Today (est.) | −0.97% | — | −0.86% |
| Daily | −2.39% | −1.73% | −1.35% |
| 1 week | −4.87% | −2.92% | −2.09% |
| 1 month | −8.41% | −5.90% | −4.70% |
| 3 months | −5.87% | 1.48% | −1.44% |
| 6 months | −4.57% | 12.42% | 2.69% |
| YTD | 8.62% | 27.52% | 20.04% |
| 1 year | 15.61% | 32.76% | 28.83% |
| 3 years | 77.58% | 235.05% | 156.52% |
Popular Comparisons
Popular Fund Comparisons
Related Pages
About the FID vs MET Comparison
The price, returns, size and risk of FID (Fiba Portföy Çoklu Varlık İkinci Değişken Fon) and MET (Garanti Portföy Metaverse ve Yeni Teknolojiler Değişken Fon) are compared side by side as of October 23, 2026. Of the 10 metrics compared, FID leads in 1 and MET leads in 9. FID is a Variable Fund fund managed by Fiba Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; MET is a Variable Fund fund managed by Garanti Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..
Highlights: Daily: MET leads (−1.73% vs −2.39%). 1 week: MET leads (−2.92% vs −4.87%). 1 month: MET leads (−5.90% vs −8.41%). 3 months: MET leads (1.48% vs −5.87%). 6 months: MET leads (12.42% vs −4.57%). YTD: MET leads (27.52% vs 8.62%). 1 year: MET leads (32.76% vs 15.61%). 3 years: MET leads (235.05% vs 77.58%). Size (TRY): FID leads (745.8M vs 734.2M). Investors: MET leads (6,285 vs 1,569).
Frequently Asked Questions
Which earned more, FID or MET?
Year to date FID returned 8.62% and MET returned 27.52%; over the last year FID returned 15.61% and MET returned 32.76%. Over the last month FID returned −8.41% and MET returned −5.90%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.
Which is larger and which has more investors, FID or MET?
As of October 23, 2026, FID has a size of TRY 745.8M with 1,569 investors, while MET has a size of TRY 734.2M with 6,285 investors. FID leads in size and MET leads in investor count.
What do the risk scores of FID and MET mean?
The CMB risk score of FID is 6 out of 7 and that of MET is 6. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.