Yatırımcı.AI

IEF vs MET Fund Comparison

Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of IEF (Zurich Yaşam ve Emeklilik A.Ş. Dinamik Değişken Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) and MET (Garanti Portföy Metaverse ve Yeni Teknolojiler Değişken Fon) side by side.

IEFMET
StockFund

If You Had Invested TRY 10,000

Metric Comparison

IEF vs MET Fund Comparison
MetricIEFMETCategory median
Daily−1.32%−1.17%−0.83%
1 week−2.44%0.08%−0.98%
1 month−3.73%3.65%−1.82%
3 months0.98%11.58%3.78%
6 months7.99%37.40%14.04%
YTD18.19%32.99%24.40%
1 year28.36%40.94%34.17%
3 years103.20%258.80%157.59%
Returns are based on prices as of September 29, 2026; the fund with the higher return or the lower risk score counts as the leader.

Popular Comparisons

Popular Fund Comparisons

Related Pages

About the IEF vs MET Comparison

The price, returns, size and risk of IEF (Zurich Yaşam ve Emeklilik A.Ş. Dinamik Değişken Emeklilik Yatırım Fonu) and MET (Garanti Portföy Metaverse ve Yeni Teknolojiler Değişken Fon) are compared side by side as of September 29, 2026. Of the 10 metrics compared, IEF leads in 2 and MET leads in 8. IEF is a Variable Fund fund managed by NN Hayat ve Emeklilik A.Ş.; MET is a Variable Fund fund managed by Garanti Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..

Highlights: Daily: MET leads (−1.17% vs −1.32%). 1 week: MET leads (0.08% vs −2.44%). 1 month: MET leads (3.65% vs −3.73%). 3 months: MET leads (11.58% vs 0.98%). 6 months: MET leads (37.40% vs 7.99%). YTD: MET leads (32.99% vs 18.19%). 1 year: MET leads (40.94% vs 28.36%). 3 years: MET leads (258.80% vs 103.20%). Size (TRY): IEF leads (792.7M vs 771.9M). Investors: IEF leads (37,430 vs 6,376).

Frequently Asked Questions

Year to date IEF returned 18.19% and MET returned 32.99%; over the last year IEF returned 28.36% and MET returned 40.94%. Over the last month IEF returned −3.73% and MET returned 3.65%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.

As of September 29, 2026, IEF has a size of TRY 792.7M with 37,430 investors, while MET has a size of TRY 771.9M with 6,376 investors. IEF leads in size and IEF leads in investor count.

The CMB risk score of IEF is 6 out of 7 and that of MET is 6. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.