IMF vs MDF Fund Comparison
Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of IMF (İstanbul Portföy Maestro Serbest Fon) and MDF (Fiba Portföy Model Emtia Fon Sepeti Serbest Fon) side by side.
If You Had Invested TRY 10,000
Metric Comparison
| Metric | IMF | MDF | Category median |
|---|---|---|---|
| Daily | −1.43% | −1.10% | 0.09% |
| 1 week | 1.48% | −1.64% | 0.68% |
| 1 month | 1.74% | −6.00% | 2.03% |
| 3 months | 3.40% | 3.25% | 3.24% |
| 6 months | 8.60% | 2.48% | 8.32% |
| YTD | 10.93% | 13.70% | 17.48% |
| 1 year | 14.20% | 21.93% | 21.33% |
| 3 years | 91.38% | — | 105.67% |
Popular Comparisons
Popular Fund Comparisons
Related Pages
About the IMF vs MDF Comparison
The price, returns, size and risk of IMF (İstanbul Portföy Maestro Serbest Fon) and MDF (Fiba Portföy Model Emtia Fon Sepeti Serbest Fon) are compared side by side as of November 11, 2026. Of the 10 metrics compared, IMF leads in 6 and MDF leads in 4. IMF is a Hedge Fund fund managed by İstanbul Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; MDF is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Fiba Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..
Highlights: Daily: MDF leads (−1.10% vs −1.43%). 1 week: IMF leads (1.48% vs −1.64%). 1 month: IMF leads (1.74% vs −6.00%). 3 months: IMF leads (3.40% vs 3.25%). 6 months: IMF leads (8.60% vs 2.48%). YTD: MDF leads (13.70% vs 10.93%). 1 year: MDF leads (21.93% vs 14.20%). Size (TRY): IMF leads (317.2M vs 316.7M). Investors: MDF leads (737 vs 18). Risk: IMF leads (5 vs 6).
Frequently Asked Questions
Which earned more, IMF or MDF?
Year to date IMF returned 10.93% and MDF returned 13.70%; over the last year IMF returned 14.20% and MDF returned 21.93%. Over the last month IMF returned 1.74% and MDF returned −6.00%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.
Which is larger and which has more investors, IMF or MDF?
As of November 11, 2026, IMF has a size of TRY 317.2M with 18 investors, while MDF has a size of TRY 316.7M with 737 investors. IMF leads in size and MDF leads in investor count.
What do the risk scores of IMF and MDF mean?
The CMB risk score of IMF is 5 out of 7 and that of MDF is 6. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.