Yatırımcı.AI

FSH vs MDF Fund Comparison

Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of FSH (Fiba Portföy Fon Sepeti Serbest Fon) and MDF (Fiba Portföy Model Emtia Fon Sepeti Serbest Fon) side by side.

FSHMDF
StockFund

If You Had Invested TRY 10,000

Metric Comparison

FSH vs MDF Fund Comparison
MetricFSHMDFCategory median
Daily−2.81%0.23%0.16%
1 week0.25%0.09%0.46%
1 month−4.25%−0.07%1.10%
3 months3.81%11.45%3.53%
6 months15.66%7.71%8.53%
YTD32.54%19.57%16.14%
1 year30.69%30.25%19.94%
3 years259.03%—103.56%
Returns are based on prices as of November 2, 2026; the fund with the higher return or the lower risk score counts as the leader.

Popular Comparisons

Popular Fund Comparisons

Related Pages

About the FSH vs MDF Comparison

The price, returns, size and risk of FSH (Fiba Portföy Fon Sepeti Serbest Fon) and MDF (Fiba Portföy Model Emtia Fon Sepeti Serbest Fon) are compared side by side as of November 2, 2026. Of the 9 metrics compared, FSH leads in 4 and MDF leads in 5. FSH is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Fiba Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; MDF is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Fiba Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..

Highlights: Daily: MDF leads (0.23% vs −2.81%). 1 week: FSH leads (0.25% vs 0.09%). 1 month: MDF leads (−0.07% vs −4.25%). 3 months: MDF leads (11.45% vs 3.81%). 6 months: FSH leads (15.66% vs 7.71%). YTD: FSH leads (32.54% vs 19.57%). 1 year: FSH leads (30.69% vs 30.25%). Size (TRY): MDF leads (346M vs 341.3M). Investors: MDF leads (766 vs 431).

Frequently Asked Questions

Year to date FSH returned 32.54% and MDF returned 19.57%; over the last year FSH returned 30.69% and MDF returned 30.25%. Over the last month FSH returned −4.25% and MDF returned −0.07%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.

As of November 2, 2026, FSH has a size of TRY 341.3M with 431 investors, while MDF has a size of TRY 346M with 766 investors. MDF leads in size and MDF leads in investor count.

The CMB risk score of FSH is 6 out of 7 and that of MDF is 6. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.