Yatırımcı.AI

KRT vs MOZ Fund Comparison

Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of KRT (Kare Portföy Türkiye Odaklı Serbest (Döviz ) Fon) and MOZ (Emaa Blue Portföy Mozaik Serbest Fon) side by side.

KRTMOZ
StockFund

If You Had Invested TRY 10,000

Metric Comparison

KRT vs MOZ Fund Comparison
MetricKRTMOZCategory median
Daily0.01%−1.04%0.07%
1 week0.20%0.74%0.51%
1 month1.35%−6.28%1.66%
3 months4.19%−4.25%3.04%
6 months10.70%0.43%8.17%
YTD18.64%16.33%17.49%
1 year21.39%20.54%21.23%
3 years108.94%—105.57%
Returns are based on prices as of November 13, 2026; the fund with the higher return or the lower risk score counts as the leader.

Popular Comparisons

Popular Fund Comparisons

Related Pages

About the KRT vs MOZ Comparison

The price, returns, size and risk of KRT (Kare Portföy Türkiye Odaklı Serbest (Döviz ) Fon) and MOZ (Emaa Blue Portföy Mozaik Serbest Fon) are compared side by side as of November 13, 2026. Of the 10 metrics compared, KRT leads in 9 and MOZ leads in 1. KRT is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Kare Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; MOZ is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Emaa Blue Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..

Highlights: Daily: KRT leads (0.01% vs −1.04%). 1 week: MOZ leads (0.74% vs 0.20%). 1 month: KRT leads (1.35% vs −6.28%). 3 months: KRT leads (4.19% vs −4.25%). 6 months: KRT leads (10.70% vs 0.43%). YTD: KRT leads (18.64% vs 16.33%). 1 year: KRT leads (21.39% vs 20.54%). Size (TRY): KRT leads (386.5M vs 375.1M). Investors: KRT leads (116 vs 80). Risk: KRT leads (3 vs 5).

Frequently Asked Questions

Year to date KRT returned 18.64% and MOZ returned 16.33%; over the last year KRT returned 21.39% and MOZ returned 20.54%. Over the last month KRT returned 1.35% and MOZ returned −6.28%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.

As of November 13, 2026, KRT has a size of TRY 386.5M with 116 investors, while MOZ has a size of TRY 375.1M with 80 investors. KRT leads in size and KRT leads in investor count.

The CMB risk score of KRT is 3 out of 7 and that of MOZ is 5. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.