Yatırımcı.AI

BLD vs KRT Fund Comparison

Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of BLD (Deniz Portföy Balev Eğitime Destek Serbest Fon) and KRT (Kare Portföy Türkiye Odaklı Serbest (Döviz ) Fon) side by side.

BLDKRT
StockFund

If You Had Invested TRY 10,000

Metric Comparison

BLD vs KRT Fund Comparison
MetricBLDKRTCategory median
Daily0.09%0.01%0.07%
1 week0.66%0.20%0.51%
1 month2.98%1.35%1.66%
3 months9.45%4.19%3.04%
6 months20.70%10.70%8.17%
YTD37.90%18.64%17.49%
1 year44.88%21.39%21.23%
3 years—108.94%105.57%
Returns are based on prices as of November 13, 2026; the fund with the higher return or the lower risk score counts as the leader.

Popular Comparisons

Popular Fund Comparisons

Related Pages

About the BLD vs KRT Comparison

The price, returns, size and risk of BLD (Deniz Portföy Balev Eğitime Destek Serbest Fon) and KRT (Kare Portföy Türkiye Odaklı Serbest (Döviz ) Fon) are compared side by side as of November 13, 2026. Of the 10 metrics compared, BLD leads in 9 and KRT leads in 1. BLD is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Deniz Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; KRT is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Kare Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..

Highlights: Daily: BLD leads (0.09% vs 0.01%). 1 week: BLD leads (0.66% vs 0.20%). 1 month: BLD leads (2.98% vs 1.35%). 3 months: BLD leads (9.45% vs 4.19%). 6 months: BLD leads (20.70% vs 10.70%). YTD: BLD leads (37.90% vs 18.64%). 1 year: BLD leads (44.88% vs 21.39%). Size (TRY): KRT leads (386.5M vs 374.7M). Investors: BLD leads (635 vs 116). Risk: BLD leads (2 vs 3).

Frequently Asked Questions

Year to date BLD returned 37.90% and KRT returned 18.64%; over the last year BLD returned 44.88% and KRT returned 21.39%. Over the last month BLD returned 2.98% and KRT returned 1.35%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.

As of November 13, 2026, BLD has a size of TRY 374.7M with 635 investors, while KRT has a size of TRY 386.5M with 116 investors. KRT leads in size and BLD leads in investor count.

The CMB risk score of BLD is 2 out of 7 and that of KRT is 3. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.