Yatırımcı.AI

MOZ vs YCK Fund Comparison

Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of MOZ (Emaa Blue Portföy Mozaik Serbest Fon) and YCK (Yapı Kredi Portföy Cihangir Serbest Fon) side by side.

MOZYCK
StockFund

If You Had Invested TRY 10,000

Metric Comparison

MOZ vs YCK Fund Comparison
MetricMOZYCKCategory median
Daily−1.04%−2.02%0.07%
1 week0.74%2.99%0.51%
1 month−6.28%−16.79%1.66%
3 months−4.25%−10.51%3.04%
6 months0.43%−6.83%8.17%
YTD16.33%18.88%17.49%
1 year20.54%25.11%21.23%
3 years—124.30%105.57%
Returns are based on prices as of November 13, 2026; the fund with the higher return or the lower risk score counts as the leader.

Popular Comparisons

Popular Fund Comparisons

Related Pages

About the MOZ vs YCK Comparison

The price, returns, size and risk of MOZ (Emaa Blue Portföy Mozaik Serbest Fon) and YCK (Yapı Kredi Portföy Cihangir Serbest Fon) are compared side by side as of November 13, 2026. Of the 10 metrics compared, MOZ leads in 6 and YCK leads in 4. MOZ is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Emaa Blue Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; YCK is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Yapı Kredi Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..

Highlights: Daily: MOZ leads (−1.04% vs −2.02%). 1 week: YCK leads (2.99% vs 0.74%). 1 month: MOZ leads (−6.28% vs −16.79%). 3 months: MOZ leads (−4.25% vs −10.51%). 6 months: MOZ leads (0.43% vs −6.83%). YTD: YCK leads (18.88% vs 16.33%). 1 year: YCK leads (25.11% vs 20.54%). Size (TRY): MOZ leads (375.1M vs 373.9M). Investors: YCK leads (156 vs 80). Risk: MOZ leads (5 vs 6).

Frequently Asked Questions

Year to date MOZ returned 16.33% and YCK returned 18.88%; over the last year MOZ returned 20.54% and YCK returned 25.11%. Over the last month MOZ returned −6.28% and YCK returned −16.79%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.

As of November 13, 2026, MOZ has a size of TRY 375.1M with 80 investors, while YCK has a size of TRY 373.9M with 156 investors. MOZ leads in size and YCK leads in investor count.

The CMB risk score of MOZ is 5 out of 7 and that of YCK is 6. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.