KMN vs UP1 Fund Comparison
Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of KMN (Yapı Kredi Portföy Kıymetli Madenler Katılım Fonu) and UP1 (Ünlü Portföy Altın Fonu) side by side.
If you had invested TRY 10,000
Metric comparison
| Metric | KMN | UP1 | Category median |
|---|---|---|---|
| Daily | 0.45% | 0.45% | 0.46% |
| 1 week | −2.68% | −1.53% | −1.73% |
| 1 month | −5.24% | −5.40% | −5.24% |
| 3 months | 11.34% | 9.38% | 9.38% |
| 6 months | 2.46% | 2.25% | 2.11% |
| YTD | −9.80% | 7.51% | 9.19% |
| 1 year | — | 31.92% | 31.92% |
| 3 years | — | 303.92% | 198.48% |
Popular comparisons
Related pages
About the KMN vs UP1 comparison
The price, returns, size and risk of KMN (Yapı Kredi Portföy Kıymetli Madenler Katılım Fonu) and UP1 (Ünlü Portföy Altın Fonu) are compared side by side as of September 28, 2026. Of the 8 metrics compared, KMN leads in 4 and UP1 leads in 4. KMN is a Gold and Other Precious Metals Fund fund managed by Yapı Kredi Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; UP1 is a Gold and Other Precious Metals Fund fund managed by Ünlü Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..
Highlights: Daily: UP1 leads (0.45% vs 0.45%). 1 week: UP1 leads (−1.53% vs −2.68%). 1 month: KMN leads (−5.24% vs −5.40%). 3 months: KMN leads (11.34% vs 9.38%). 6 months: KMN leads (2.46% vs 2.25%). YTD: UP1 leads (7.51% vs −9.80%). Size (TRY): UP1 leads (1.4B vs 323.7M). Investors: KMN leads (4,702 vs 1,262).
Frequently asked questions
Which earned more, KMN or UP1?
Year to date KMN returned −9.80% and UP1 returned 7.51%; over the last year KMN returned — and UP1 returned 31.92%. Over the last month KMN returned −5.24% and UP1 returned −5.40%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.
Which is larger and which has more investors, KMN or UP1?
As of September 28, 2026, KMN has a size of TRY 323.7M with 4,702 investors, while UP1 has a size of TRY 1.4B with 1,262 investors. UP1 leads in size and KMN leads in investor count.
What do the risk scores of KMN and UP1 mean?
The CMB risk score of KMN is 6 out of 7 and that of UP1 is 6. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.