NAU vs UP1 Fund Comparison
Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of NAU (Neo Portföy Altın Fonu) and UP1 (Ünlü Portföy Altın Fonu) side by side.
If you had invested TRY 10,000
Metric comparison
| Metric | NAU | UP1 | Category median |
|---|---|---|---|
| Daily | 0.41% | 0.45% | 0.46% |
| 1 week | −1.73% | −1.53% | −1.73% |
| 1 month | −4.97% | −5.40% | −5.24% |
| 3 months | 8.99% | 9.38% | 9.38% |
| 6 months | 0.96% | 2.25% | 2.11% |
| YTD | 5.45% | 7.51% | 9.19% |
| 1 year | 24.43% | 31.92% | 31.92% |
| 3 years | 93.05% | 303.92% | 198.48% |
Popular comparisons
Related pages
About the NAU vs UP1 comparison
The price, returns, size and risk of NAU (Neo Portföy Altın Fonu) and UP1 (Ünlü Portföy Altın Fonu) are compared side by side as of September 28, 2026. Of the 10 metrics compared, NAU leads in 3 and UP1 leads in 7. NAU is a Gold and Other Precious Metals Fund fund managed by Neo Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; UP1 is a Gold and Other Precious Metals Fund fund managed by Ünlü Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..
Highlights: Daily: UP1 leads (0.45% vs 0.41%). 1 week: UP1 leads (−1.53% vs −1.73%). 1 month: NAU leads (−4.97% vs −5.40%). 3 months: UP1 leads (9.38% vs 8.99%). 6 months: UP1 leads (2.25% vs 0.96%). YTD: UP1 leads (7.51% vs 5.45%). 1 year: UP1 leads (31.92% vs 24.43%). 3 years: UP1 leads (303.92% vs 93.05%). Size (TRY): NAU leads (1.6B vs 1.4B). Investors: NAU leads (7,826 vs 1,262).
Frequently asked questions
Which earned more, NAU or UP1?
Year to date NAU returned 5.45% and UP1 returned 7.51%; over the last year NAU returned 24.43% and UP1 returned 31.92%. Over the last month NAU returned −4.97% and UP1 returned −5.40%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.
Which is larger and which has more investors, NAU or UP1?
As of September 28, 2026, NAU has a size of TRY 1.6B with 7,826 investors, while UP1 has a size of TRY 1.4B with 1,262 investors. NAU leads in size and NAU leads in investor count.
What do the risk scores of NAU and UP1 mean?
The CMB risk score of NAU is 6 out of 7 and that of UP1 is 6. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.