Yatırımcı.AI

KMN vs PEA Fund Comparison

Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of KMN (Yapı Kredi Portföy Kıymetli Madenler Katılım Fonu) and PEA (Perform Portföy Altın Fonu) side by side.

KMNPEA
StockFund

If You Had Invested TRY 10,000

Metric Comparison

KMN vs PEA Fund Comparison
MetricKMNPEACategory median
Daily−0.15%−0.62%−0.61%
1 week0.97%0.65%0.66%
1 month−6.07%−1.40%−1.32%
3 months−7.25%−2.39%−3.00%
6 months−17.06%−4.45%−4.65%
YTD−17.27%5.40%5.40%
1 year—11.82%13.43%
Returns are based on prices as of November 12, 2026; the fund with the higher return or the lower risk score counts as the leader.

Popular Comparisons

Popular Fund Comparisons

Related Pages

About the KMN vs PEA Comparison

The price, returns, size and risk of KMN (Yapı Kredi Portföy Kıymetli Madenler Katılım Fonu) and PEA (Perform Portföy Altın Fonu) are compared side by side as of November 12, 2026. Of the 8 metrics compared, KMN leads in 4 and PEA leads in 4. KMN is a Gold and Other Precious Metals Fund fund managed by Yapı Kredi Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; PEA is a Gold and Other Precious Metals Fund fund managed by Perform Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..

Highlights: Daily: KMN leads (−0.15% vs −0.62%). 1 week: KMN leads (0.97% vs 0.65%). 1 month: PEA leads (−1.40% vs −6.07%). 3 months: PEA leads (−2.39% vs −7.25%). 6 months: PEA leads (−4.45% vs −17.06%). YTD: PEA leads (5.40% vs −17.27%). Size (TRY): KMN leads (301.9M vs 65.8M). Investors: KMN leads (4,418 vs 77).

Frequently Asked Questions

Year to date KMN returned −17.27% and PEA returned 5.40%; over the last year KMN returned — and PEA returned 11.82%. Over the last month KMN returned −6.07% and PEA returned −1.40%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.

As of November 12, 2026, KMN has a size of TRY 301.9M with 4,418 investors, while PEA has a size of TRY 65.8M with 77 investors. KMN leads in size and KMN leads in investor count.

The CMB risk score of KMN is 6 out of 7 and that of PEA is 6. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.