KMN vs PEA Fund Comparison
Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of KMN (Yapı Kredi Portföy Kıymetli Madenler Katılım Fonu) and PEA (Perform Portföy Altın Fonu) side by side.
If you had invested TRY 10,000
Metric comparison
| Metric | KMN | PEA | Category median |
|---|---|---|---|
| Daily | 0.45% | 0.56% | 0.46% |
| 1 week | −2.68% | −1.78% | −1.73% |
| 1 month | −5.24% | −5.11% | −5.24% |
| 3 months | 11.34% | 10.35% | 9.38% |
| 6 months | 2.46% | 2.37% | 2.11% |
| YTD | −9.80% | 9.19% | 9.19% |
| 1 year | — | 24.33% | 31.92% |
Popular comparisons
Related pages
About the KMN vs PEA comparison
The price, returns, size and risk of KMN (Yapı Kredi Portföy Kıymetli Madenler Katılım Fonu) and PEA (Perform Portföy Altın Fonu) are compared side by side as of September 28, 2026. Of the 8 metrics compared, KMN leads in 4 and PEA leads in 4. KMN is a Gold and Other Precious Metals Fund fund managed by Yapı Kredi Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; PEA is a Gold and Other Precious Metals Fund fund managed by Perform Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..
Highlights: Daily: PEA leads (0.56% vs 0.45%). 1 week: PEA leads (−1.78% vs −2.68%). 1 month: PEA leads (−5.11% vs −5.24%). 3 months: KMN leads (11.34% vs 10.35%). 6 months: KMN leads (2.46% vs 2.37%). YTD: PEA leads (9.19% vs −9.80%). Size (TRY): KMN leads (323.7M vs 68.3M). Investors: KMN leads (4,702 vs 87).
Frequently asked questions
Which earned more, KMN or PEA?
Year to date KMN returned −9.80% and PEA returned 9.19%; over the last year KMN returned — and PEA returned 24.33%. Over the last month KMN returned −5.24% and PEA returned −5.11%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.
Which is larger and which has more investors, KMN or PEA?
As of September 28, 2026, KMN has a size of TRY 323.7M with 4,702 investors, while PEA has a size of TRY 68.3M with 87 investors. KMN leads in size and KMN leads in investor count.
What do the risk scores of KMN and PEA mean?
The CMB risk score of KMN is 6 out of 7 and that of PEA is 6. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.