FAL vs KMN Fund Comparison
Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of FAL (One Portföy Altın Fonu) and KMN (Yapı Kredi Portföy Kıymetli Madenler Katılım Fonu) side by side.
If You Had Invested TRY 10,000
Metric Comparison
| Metric | FAL | KMN | Category median |
|---|---|---|---|
| Daily | −0.68% | −0.15% | −0.61% |
| 1 week | 1.01% | 0.97% | 0.66% |
| 1 month | −1.16% | −6.07% | −1.32% |
| 3 months | −3.25% | −7.25% | −3.00% |
| 6 months | −5.41% | −17.06% | −4.65% |
| YTD | 5.85% | −17.27% | 5.40% |
| 1 year | 17.62% | — | 13.43% |
Popular Comparisons
Popular Fund Comparisons
Related Pages
About the FAL vs KMN Comparison
The price, returns, size and risk of FAL (One Portföy Altın Fonu) and KMN (Yapı Kredi Portföy Kıymetli Madenler Katılım Fonu) are compared side by side as of November 12, 2026. Of the 8 metrics compared, FAL leads in 5 and KMN leads in 3. FAL is a Gold and Other Precious Metals Fund fund managed by Foneria Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; KMN is a Gold and Other Precious Metals Fund fund managed by Yapı Kredi Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..
Highlights: Daily: KMN leads (−0.15% vs −0.68%). 1 week: FAL leads (1.01% vs 0.97%). 1 month: FAL leads (−1.16% vs −6.07%). 3 months: FAL leads (−3.25% vs −7.25%). 6 months: FAL leads (−5.41% vs −17.06%). YTD: FAL leads (5.85% vs −17.27%). Size (TRY): KMN leads (301.9M vs 267.6M). Investors: KMN leads (4,418 vs 465).
Frequently Asked Questions
Which earned more, FAL or KMN?
Year to date FAL returned 5.85% and KMN returned −17.27%; over the last year FAL returned 17.62% and KMN returned —. Over the last month FAL returned −1.16% and KMN returned −6.07%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.
Which is larger and which has more investors, FAL or KMN?
As of November 12, 2026, FAL has a size of TRY 267.6M with 465 investors, while KMN has a size of TRY 301.9M with 4,418 investors. KMN leads in size and KMN leads in investor count.
What do the risk scores of FAL and KMN mean?
The CMB risk score of FAL is 6 out of 7 and that of KMN is 6. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.