Yatırımcı.AI

KMN vs PAF Fund Comparison

Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of KMN (Yapı Kredi Portföy Kıymetli Madenler Katılım Fonu) and PAF (Pardus Portföy Altın Fonu) side by side.

PAF cannot currently be bought or sold on TEFAS. Its returns in this comparison are based on the last price published on TEFAS (October 23, 2026). PAF fund page

KMNPAF
StockFund

If You Had Invested TRY 10,000

Metric Comparison

KMN vs PAF Fund Comparison
MetricKMNPAFCategory median
Daily−0.99%−0.82%−0.83%
1 week−0.72%−1.14%−1.19%
1 month−7.84%−3.61%−3.68%
3 months1.18%3.71%2.93%
6 months−12.90%−6.36%−6.13%
YTD−15.30%0.80%5.02%
1 year—10.05%10.45%
3 years—82.23%82.23%
Returns are based on prices as of October 23, 2026; the fund with the higher return or the lower risk score counts as the leader.

Popular Comparisons

Popular Fund Comparisons

Related Pages

About the KMN vs PAF Comparison

The price, returns, size and risk of KMN (Yapı Kredi Portföy Kıymetli Madenler Katılım Fonu) and PAF (Pardus Portföy Altın Fonu) are compared side by side as of October 23, 2026. Of the 8 metrics compared, KMN leads in 3 and PAF leads in 5. KMN is a Gold and Other Precious Metals Fund fund managed by Yapı Kredi Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; PAF is a Gold and Other Precious Metals Fund fund managed by Pardus Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..

Highlights: Daily: PAF leads (−0.82% vs −0.99%). 1 week: KMN leads (−0.72% vs −1.14%). 1 month: PAF leads (−3.61% vs −7.84%). 3 months: PAF leads (3.71% vs 1.18%). 6 months: PAF leads (−6.36% vs −12.90%). YTD: PAF leads (0.80% vs −15.30%). Size (TRY): KMN leads (310.3M vs 256.7M). Investors: KMN leads (4,494 vs 3,052).

Frequently Asked Questions

Year to date KMN returned −15.30% and PAF returned 0.80%; over the last year KMN returned — and PAF returned 10.05%. Over the last month KMN returned −7.84% and PAF returned −3.61%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.

As of October 23, 2026, KMN has a size of TRY 310.3M with 4,494 investors, while PAF has a size of TRY 256.7M with 3,052 investors. KMN leads in size and KMN leads in investor count.

The CMB risk score of KMN is 6 out of 7 and that of PAF is 6. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.