KMN vs NAU Fund Comparison
Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of KMN (Yapı Kredi Portföy Kıymetli Madenler Katılım Fonu) and NAU (Neo Portföy Altın Fonu) side by side.
If you had invested TRY 10,000
Metric comparison
| Metric | KMN | NAU | Category median |
|---|---|---|---|
| Daily | 0.45% | 0.41% | 0.46% |
| 1 week | −2.68% | −1.73% | −1.73% |
| 1 month | −5.24% | −4.97% | −5.24% |
| 3 months | 11.34% | 8.99% | 9.38% |
| 6 months | 2.46% | 0.96% | 2.11% |
| YTD | −9.80% | 5.45% | 9.19% |
| 1 year | — | 24.43% | 31.92% |
| 3 years | — | 93.05% | 198.48% |
Popular comparisons
Related pages
About the KMN vs NAU comparison
The price, returns, size and risk of KMN (Yapı Kredi Portföy Kıymetli Madenler Katılım Fonu) and NAU (Neo Portföy Altın Fonu) are compared side by side as of September 28, 2026. Of the 8 metrics compared, KMN leads in 3 and NAU leads in 5. KMN is a Gold and Other Precious Metals Fund fund managed by Yapı Kredi Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; NAU is a Gold and Other Precious Metals Fund fund managed by Neo Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..
Highlights: Daily: KMN leads (0.45% vs 0.41%). 1 week: NAU leads (−1.73% vs −2.68%). 1 month: NAU leads (−4.97% vs −5.24%). 3 months: KMN leads (11.34% vs 8.99%). 6 months: KMN leads (2.46% vs 0.96%). YTD: NAU leads (5.45% vs −9.80%). Size (TRY): NAU leads (1.6B vs 323.7M). Investors: NAU leads (7,826 vs 4,702).
Frequently asked questions
Which earned more, KMN or NAU?
Year to date KMN returned −9.80% and NAU returned 5.45%; over the last year KMN returned — and NAU returned 24.43%. Over the last month KMN returned −5.24% and NAU returned −4.97%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.
Which is larger and which has more investors, KMN or NAU?
As of September 28, 2026, KMN has a size of TRY 323.7M with 4,702 investors, while NAU has a size of TRY 1.6B with 7,826 investors. NAU leads in size and NAU leads in investor count.
What do the risk scores of KMN and NAU mean?
The CMB risk score of KMN is 6 out of 7 and that of NAU is 6. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.