Yatırımcı.AI

KLI vs MTG Fund Comparison

Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of KLI (Ak Portföy Para Piyasası Katılım Serbest Fon) and MTG (Deniz Portföy Mutlak Getiri Hedefli Hisse Senedi Serbest Fon (Hisse Senedi Yogun Fon)) side by side.

KLIMTG
StockFund

If You Had Invested TRY 10,000

Metric Comparison

KLI vs MTG Fund Comparison
MetricKLIMTGCategory median
Today (est.)—−1.49%−1.16%
Daily0.11%0.19%0.01%
1 week0.66%−0.67%0.30%
1 month2.85%−0.14%0.00%
3 months9.67%1.97%3.96%
6 months21.10%16.85%8.18%
YTD35.66%22.24%15.73%
1 year—30.89%20.69%
Returns are based on prices as of October 23, 2026; the fund with the higher return or the lower risk score counts as the leader. Today (est.): live estimated return of funds with at least 50% coverage, last calculated Oct 24, 2026, 06:03.

Popular Comparisons

Popular Fund Comparisons

Related Pages

About the KLI vs MTG Comparison

The price, returns, size and risk of KLI (Ak Portföy Para Piyasası Katılım Serbest Fon) and MTG (Deniz Portföy Mutlak Getiri Hedefli Hisse Senedi Serbest Fon (Hisse Senedi Yogun Fon)) are compared side by side as of October 23, 2026. Of the 9 metrics compared, KLI leads in 6 and MTG leads in 3. KLI is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Ak Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; MTG is a Hedge Fund fund managed by Deniz Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..

Highlights: Daily: MTG leads (0.19% vs 0.11%). 1 week: KLI leads (0.66% vs −0.67%). 1 month: KLI leads (2.85% vs −0.14%). 3 months: KLI leads (9.67% vs 1.97%). 6 months: KLI leads (21.10% vs 16.85%). YTD: KLI leads (35.66% vs 22.24%). Size (TRY): MTG leads (80.4M vs 76.8M). Investors: MTG leads (187 vs 132). Risk: KLI leads (2 vs 3).

Frequently Asked Questions

Year to date KLI returned 35.66% and MTG returned 22.24%; over the last year KLI returned — and MTG returned 30.89%. Over the last month KLI returned 2.85% and MTG returned −0.14%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.

As of October 23, 2026, KLI has a size of TRY 76.8M with 132 investors, while MTG has a size of TRY 80.4M with 187 investors. MTG leads in size and MTG leads in investor count.

The CMB risk score of KLI is 2 out of 7 and that of MTG is 3. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.