Yatırımcı.AI

KIK vs RRP Fund Comparison

Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of KIK (Kuveyt Türk Portföy İkinci Katılım Fonu) and RRP (Re-Pie Portföy Para Piyasası Katılım (TL) Fon) side by side.

KIKRRP
StockFund

If You Had Invested TRY 10,000

Metric Comparison

KIK vs RRP Fund Comparison
MetricKIKRRPCategory median
Daily−2.41%0.11%−0.60%
1 week−2.31%0.55%−0.86%
1 month−5.72%2.78%−0.33%
3 months−3.25%9.28%4.42%
6 months3.25%20.28%12.01%
YTD25.66%34.16%28.30%
1 year28.49%43.73%34.68%
Returns are based on prices as of October 23, 2026; the fund with the higher return or the lower risk score counts as the leader.

Popular Comparisons

Popular Fund Comparisons

Related Pages

About the KIK vs RRP Comparison

The price, returns, size and risk of KIK (Kuveyt Türk Portföy İkinci Katılım Fonu) and RRP (Re-Pie Portföy Para Piyasası Katılım (TL) Fon) are compared side by side as of October 23, 2026. Of the 10 metrics compared, KIK leads in 2 and RRP leads in 8. KIK is a Shariah-compliant Fund fund managed by Kuveyt Türk Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; RRP is a Shariah-compliant Fund fund managed by Re-Pie Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..

Highlights: Daily: RRP leads (0.11% vs −2.41%). 1 week: RRP leads (0.55% vs −2.31%). 1 month: RRP leads (2.78% vs −5.72%). 3 months: RRP leads (9.28% vs −3.25%). 6 months: RRP leads (20.28% vs 3.25%). YTD: RRP leads (34.16% vs 25.66%). 1 year: RRP leads (43.73% vs 28.49%). Size (TRY): KIK leads (141M vs 457.9K). Investors: KIK leads (1,241 vs 64). Risk: RRP leads (2 vs 6).

Frequently Asked Questions

Year to date KIK returned 25.66% and RRP returned 34.16%; over the last year KIK returned 28.49% and RRP returned 43.73%. Over the last month KIK returned −5.72% and RRP returned 2.78%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.

As of October 23, 2026, KIK has a size of TRY 141M with 1,241 investors, while RRP has a size of TRY 457.9K with 64 investors. KIK leads in size and KIK leads in investor count.

The CMB risk score of KIK is 6 out of 7 and that of RRP is 2. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.