Yatırımcı.AI

KIK vs ZBI Fund Comparison

Price, period returns, size, investor count and risk score of KIK (Kuveyt Türk Portföy İkinci Katılım Fonu) and ZBI (Ziraat Portföy Temkinli Katılım Fonu) side by side.

KIKZBI
StockFund

If You Had Invested TRY 10,000

Metric Comparison

KIK vs ZBI Fund Comparison
MetricKIKZBICategory median
Daily−2.41%−0.47%−0.60%
1 week−2.31%−0.86%−0.86%
1 month−5.72%0.33%−0.33%
3 months−3.25%5.83%4.42%
6 months3.25%15.10%12.01%
YTD25.66%31.47%28.30%
1 year28.49%40.03%34.68%
3 years—26.57%158.22%
Returns are based on prices as of October 23, 2026; the fund with the higher return or the lower risk score counts as the leader.

Popular Comparisons

Popular Fund Comparisons

Related Pages

About the KIK vs ZBI Comparison

The price, returns, size and risk of KIK (Kuveyt Türk Portföy İkinci Katılım Fonu) and ZBI (Ziraat Portföy Temkinli Katılım Fonu) are compared side by side as of October 23, 2026. Of the 10 metrics compared, KIK leads in 0 and ZBI leads in 10. KIK is a Shariah-compliant Fund fund managed by Kuveyt Türk Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş.; ZBI is a Shariah-compliant Fund fund managed by Ziraat Portföy Yönetimi A.Ş..

Highlights: Daily: ZBI leads (−0.47% vs −2.41%). 1 week: ZBI leads (−0.86% vs −2.31%). 1 month: ZBI leads (0.33% vs −5.72%). 3 months: ZBI leads (5.83% vs −3.25%). 6 months: ZBI leads (15.10% vs 3.25%). YTD: ZBI leads (31.47% vs 25.66%). 1 year: ZBI leads (40.03% vs 28.49%). Size (TRY): ZBI leads (144.1M vs 141M). Investors: ZBI leads (1,723 vs 1,241). Risk: ZBI leads (3 vs 6).

Frequently Asked Questions

Year to date KIK returned 25.66% and ZBI returned 31.47%; over the last year KIK returned 28.49% and ZBI returned 40.03%. Over the last month KIK returned −5.72% and ZBI returned 0.33%. Past performance does not indicate future returns.

As of October 23, 2026, KIK has a size of TRY 141M with 1,241 investors, while ZBI has a size of TRY 144.1M with 1,723 investors. ZBI leads in size and ZBI leads in investor count.

The CMB risk score of KIK is 6 out of 7 and that of ZBI is 3. The risk score reflects the historical volatility of the fund price; 1 is the lowest and 7 the highest risk. A lower score means less volatility, not a guarantee of higher returns.